primetime
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2005
- Messages
- 13,627
- Reaction score
- 15,375
Thank you for this, but the poster's original argument was that the US endorsed slavery as an economic means. This is basically the government turning a blind eye towards slavery.
I mean, the antebellum US was basically a constant dance and compromise between an industrializing north and the slave economy south. That dance ended explosively with the rise of the Republican Party and the election of Lincoln. It wasn't an "endorsement" but the US certainly allowed slavery to continue in southern states - and even compromised on its westward expansion - for economic reasons. The Industrial Revolution in England, and then in the rest of Europe and the northern United States, was driven at first by textile manufacturing, which was in turn driven by a voracious demand for cotton from southern US slave plantations and coolie labor in British India.