- Joined
- Sep 2, 2006
- Messages
- 9,923
- Reaction score
- 10,176
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Don't ignore Armand Membou who is probably OT 1 now. He's a RT but probably could switch to LTIs Banks even a first rounder. I've seen mocks without him?
Edit nevermind the one I was looking at had him going to bears at 11. Another around 20.
Don't ignore Armand Membou who is probably OT 1 now. He's a RT but probably could switch to LT
Poetry in motion, my friend. Vince was one heck of an athlete for his enormous size. Mr. Wilfork is a Hall of Famer (Canton) my book. Offenses had to plan for Vince on every play. A major force.
Yes Warren,I’m out on Campbell barring a nice trade down where they acquired another 2nd rounder.
Top 10 you ignore position (other than QB obviously) and just take the guy you most believe will be an impact player even if it isn’t a top need.
So, for me that means if TE, Corner, DL is best player sitting there you take him.
What you DON’T do is say “we need a LT and WR so we gotta take one here” if none have first round grades for you.
Tet is sinking like a stone because of low end speed AND that a huge chunk of his stats were put up against two garbage teams.
Campbell is a guard.
This isn’t a team that needs a guard high.
Defense low key sucked last year, and Hunter Henry is getting old.
TE could be a sneaky smart play if it falls that way.
40 time is completely irrelevant for OT's.Cambell just ran a 4.98 40. Best so far by a bit...thats insane for a lineman. Jesus..
Don't disagree. Just saying getting that size moving is pretty neat to see. His numbers scare me at the NFL level as a tackle though. I bet he drops pretty far in the draft now. Like mid teens or so.40 time is completely irrelevant for OT's.
Why did I read this as I'm gonna plow your mother. I have issuesCampbell sounds like...."I'm gonna plow you so bad your mother is going to feel it in her bones, I'm going to crush you to the point that #SteelMan isn't going to be able to help you anymore for $3 per...I will disintegrate you!"
I would still take Campbell at <33 than Banks >33.So much misinformation out there. I think the 33 7/8 was from LSU so that might be an exaggeration in the player's favor by the school
If his arm length is in fact < 33in then as a LT that is a bit of a concern for sure.
Banks measured much better than expected. He is the clear OT1 now imo. #4 would still be a reach for him though. If Sanders falls, I could see them taking him with a trade down to 6-9.
Generally most wouldn't take much stock in an OLs 40 time but maybe some speed helps him overcome the arms. And it is still indictive of a good athlete.Cambell just ran a 4.98 40. Best so far by a bit...thats insane for a lineman. Jesus..
What you DON’T do is say “we need a LT and WR so we gotta take one here” if none have first round grades for you.
Tet is sinking like a stone because of low end speed AND that a huge chunk of his stats were put up against two garbage teams.
I agree completely that it is a red flag. I also understand not wanting to risk injury now and again during pro day.I was out on Tet early, but was starting to say we'll maybe, need someone to fill a position that isn't going to get filled this season....maybe he will play better in the NFL than I think.....but no athletic testing by him is a big red flag for me.
I would still take Campbell at <33 than Banks >33.
I believe in the tape more than arm length. I would still take Campbell over Banks or Conerly
| 28 | 4K |
| 5 | 908 |
| 554 | 57K |
| 11 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 3 - April 18 (Through 26yrs)











