Ice_Ice_Brady
where black is the color where none is the number
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 26,972
- Reaction score
- 53,338
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Is it me or is the C's defense less effective so far this year?
Yes. I can’t remember who posted it but someone said Mazulla is basically selling out to prevent the 3 ball to prevent teams from playing Celtics ball against them. Hence, the help-side defense is non-existent in the paint and midrange. Then combine that with the major defensive flaws of Queta and Kornet, and that I’m seeing a lot opportunities for defenders to step up and just making a business decision to stay put and concede layups.Is it me or is the C's defense less effective so far this year?
Celtics trainers spotted unloading a trailer full of bubble wrapKP is returning tonight
| Kornet Horford Tatum White Pritchard Bench: Tillman and Springer | Queta Porzingis Hauser Brown Holiday Bench: Scheireman and Walsh |
Add to that they are all pretty young and have won a title and it's even worse. Swap this roster for the Knicks, Lakers, Bulls, Philly etc...and they would be the talk of the NBA. Talk of the possible best team ever etc etc. Probably would have happened during the Finals run then gotten even more vocal after they won.The depth and development of this team is really something. Just BSing over a few beers with a friend was realizing you could probably split this team in half, sprinkle in filler, and have two teams that should make the playoffs. Quick crapshoot split for the sake of the exercise:
Kornet
Horford
Tatum
White
Pritchard
Bench: Tillman and SpringerQueta
Porzingis
Hauser
Brown
Holiday
Bench: Scheireman and Walsh
I like it. Question is, who you got if those teams played?The depth and development of this team is really something. Just BSing over a few beers with a friend was realizing you could probably split this team in half, sprinkle in filler, and have two teams that should make the playoffs. Quick crapshoot split for the sake of the exercise:
Kornet
Horford
Tatum
White
Pritchard
Bench: Tillman and SpringerQueta
Porzingis
Hauser
Brown
Holiday
Bench: Scheireman and Walsh
I know the tournament’s not going anywhere so I should try to care, but I just hate it.This is going to sound like whining but….
If you’re playing in a “cup tournament” in any sport, you should advance to the knockout round if you’re 3-1 in your group. Otherwise, you just played the knockout round, you just weren’t aware it was single elmination. But that’s the whole point: the group stage wasn’t designed to be single elimination; it was designed for teams to advance even if they had one loss.
Basically every other format like this has the top two teams in the group advance. The wild card comes into play with tiebreakers for teams that went .500 or in soccer 1-1-1 and weren’t top-2. Being a top-2 team in a group of 4 is almost universally enough to get into the knockout stage in every sport around the globe. Being a top-2 team in a group of 5 should absolutely get you there.
If the Celtics make it, great. But even if they do, this is a stupid format, and it was last year also. NBA could just add a few extra games.m
And another reason this format sucks: Cleveland basically wasn’t playing for anything today. If they won, they still likely lose out to the Celtics and pray for point differential advancement. If they lost, they lose out to the Hawks. It’s beyond dumb that coming into today, they were 2-1 (close loss to best team in league) with very little hope to advance. All because of this idiotic format.
That's a tough call. Pretty evenly matched.I like it. Question is, who you got if those teams played?
| 19 | 1K |
| 13 | 602 |
| 57 | 9K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 3 - April 18 (Through 26yrs)










