andrewgarrr
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2010
- Messages
- 2,149
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I don't think anyone is saying to get rid of Belichick or that Belichick is awful.The Patriots hit a huge draft lull in the 2006-2009 seasons. It was a general lull, with many positions affected. Some positions (DB) have continued to have failures since then.
That's where many of the problems have come from. Belittling the person who wrote the article, or the site it was on, doesn't change the underlying premise, which is that BB's poor DB drafting has had a strong negative impact upon the team. Not only should that be understood as a given, however, his FA work in the defensive secondary has also been a huge part of the problem. Defending the Patriots based upon successes in the 2001-2005 era doesn't do anything to change the reality of the failures since then.
The LB replacement struggles began in 2005 (and began mostly with attempting to bring in veteran replacements) and it took until 2012 to get it mostly fixed.
The DB replacement struggles began in 2007 and are ongoing.
The failures in those two areas alone may already have cost the team multiple SB championships. It is what it is. Killing the messenger(s) isn't going to change that.
I don't think anyone is saying to get rid of Belichick or that Belichick is awful.
It's just that if drafting of DBs wasn't so ridiculously bad we very easily could have won two (or more) championships since 2005.
If Asante catches a 'gimmie' interception...
If Tyree's helmet was greased pre-game...
If Seymour actually brings Eli down...
If Welker hauls in a difficult over the shoulder throw...
If they don't try that stupid flea flicker to Slater...
I can keep going?
What's your point? With better DBs how many opposing scoring drives would have stalled?
How many extra turnovers would we have gotten?
How many of the plays you mentioned been rendered moot because of stronger Pats DBs?
these are truly are "what if" scenarios.If the patriots hit on a couple of CB picks maybe they don't have to worry about your examples. Its pretty obvious to anyone that isn't a homer that the team has a problem identifying quality DB's, along with WR's. I think there are many posters here that could have a better percentage of picking starting db's and wr's thatn the pats.If Asante catches a 'gimmie' interception...
If Tyree's helmet was greased pre-game...
If Seymour actually brings Eli down...
If Welker hauls in a difficult over the shoulder throw...
If they don't try that stupid flea flicker to Slater...
I can keep going?
these are truly are "what if" scenarios.If the patriots hit on a couple of CB picks maybe they don't have to worry about your examples. Its pretty obvious to anyone that isn't a homer that the team has a problem identifying quality DB's, along with WR's. I think there are many posters here that could have a better percentage of picking starting db's and wr's thatn the pats.
The Patriots hit a huge draft lull in the 2006-2009 seasons. It was a general lull, with many positions affected. Some positions (DB) have continued to have failures since then.
That's where many of the problems have come from. Belittling the person who wrote the article, or the site it was on, doesn't change the underlying premise, which is that BB's poor DB drafting has had a strong negative impact upon the team. Not only should that be understood as a given, however, his FA work in the defensive secondary has also been a huge part of the problem. Defending the Patriots based upon successes in the 2001-2005 era doesn't do anything to change the reality of the failures since then.
The LB replacement struggles began in 2005 (and began mostly with attempting to bring in veteran replacements) and it took until 2012 to get it mostly fixed.
The DB replacement struggles began in 2007 and are ongoing.
The failures in those two areas alone may already have cost the team multiple SB championships. It is what it is. Killing the messenger(s) isn't going to change that.
these are truly are "what if" scenarios.If the patriots hit on a couple of CB picks maybe they don't have to worry about your examples. Its pretty obvious to anyone that isn't a homer that the team has a problem identifying quality DB's, along with WR's. I think there are many posters here that could have a better percentage of picking starting db's and wr's thatn the pats.
The Pats have been to two AFCCGs and a Super Bowl in the past two seasons. Killing the Pats is an overstatement.
The followup article on rankings gives the Pats a C for the draft, the second worst of all 32 teams...(Dallas C-)...Considering that they were one of only 8 teams to have all their draft picks make the roster, that should tell you a lot about BI and their football acumen....
Belichick's drafting defensive backs is "killing the Patriots."
Bill Belichick has 18 playoff wins as a head coach. Those with nine, half as many, include Vince Lombardi, Paul Brown, John Madden, Tony Dungy, Jimmy Johnson and John Harbaugh.
Two more playoff wins and Bill Belichick will tie Tom Landry for most all-time.
Coaches, Records, and Coaching Totals - Pro-Football-Reference.com
Interesting take on BB recent drafting of Defensive Backs in Business Insider today;
Bill Belichick's History Of Drafting Defensive Backs - Business Insider
this is actually a rework of Peters Kings blurb.
There is a well known term for what you are doing. It is called "Monday Morning Quarterbacking".
Wasn't McCourty having a bit of a resurgence at CB last year? Sure I saw a stat saying completion % against him was in the mid 30s.
It's just a case of he's a good Corner but a borderline elite Safety.
| 181 | 24K |
| 18 | 645 |
| 17 | 539 |
| 13 | 332 |
| 17 | 556 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
June 3 - June 18 (Through 26yrs)











