While it is true that McGinest came up big many times under Belichick, he was practically considered a bust during the first half of his career - at a time when players got far less scrutiny than they do today.
Chris Slade is another who had mixed reviews during his Pats career. Terry Glenn had three good years, three not so good years; overall not a really good return on expected production - though much better than that guy Parcells wanted to draft instead.
If their carers were just starting now or in the last few years, considering the standard that current fans and media fans impose, how would they be faring in the court of public opinion?
Question: if a current draft netted only one player, and it was the equivalent production of McGinest's first five years in the league, how do you think you, most other fans as a whole, and the media as a whole would think of how successful that draft was?