Best Point Comparing Brady vs. Rodgers I’ve Heard

[stinkypete]

This is your most egregious post, including the political ones.

I don't see it as that egregious. Rodgers is 34, Brady is 41. Brady is unquestionably greater today, but what about 5 years from now? Any team would pick Rodgers.

All emotion aside, if I were building a team, I would take Garoppolo over Brady because he gives me 10 - 15 years instead of 3 - 5.

The trouble with being fans is that we cannot possibly view this topic rationally because Brady has supplied us with so many emotionally memorable moments. It is heresy to suggest that we'd be better off with any other QB so long as Brady continues to deliver.

 

[Ice_Ice_Brady]

I don't see it as that egregious. Rodgers is 34, Brady is 41. Brady is unquestionably greater today, but what about 5 years from now? Any team would pick Rodgers.

All emotion aside, if I were building a team, I would take Garoppolo over Brady because he gives me 10 - 15 years instead of 3 - 5.

The trouble with being fans is that we cannot possibly view this topic rationally because Brady has supplied us with so many emotionally memorable moments. It is heresy to suggest that we'd be better off with any other QB so long as Brady continues to deliver.

I don’t think its homerism. Brady is the best even at 40. Rodgers is a damn good QB and among the best to play, but Brady has no one comparable in overall value.

 

[wolverinejoe80]

I don't see it as that egregious. Rodgers is 34, Brady is 41. Brady is unquestionably greater today, but what about 5 years from now? Any team would pick Rodgers.

All emotion aside, if I were building a team, I would take Garoppolo over Brady because he gives me 10 - 15 years instead of 3 - 5.

The trouble with being fans is that we cannot possibly view this topic rationally because Brady has supplied us with so many emotionally memorable moments. It is heresy to suggest that we'd be better off with any other QB so long as Brady continues to deliver.

brady is 40 going on 35. not every 40 is same if you ask me.

and i would rather have 3-5 years of brady than jimmy's 10-15 years. brady gives me the best chance to win right now and right now is all i care about. we've seen plenty of good players who had 10-15 years of awesome career, but no SB win. and we still have no clue how good jimmy really is. sample size is too small. is he is a gamer in a pressured situation in january? will he be able to stay healthy?

i know exactly what i'm getting in brady - the best player in the league for at least next 3 years.

that alone gives me the absolute confidence in this team to make it to another superbowl or two.