PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Bam Childress

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mike the Brit said:
Don't you think that other coaches might have caught on to the old "waive and bring back when healthy" trick (*cough* Ethan Kelley *cough*)?
Why not waived? The kid is supposed to have the talent, and maybe he'll show it when healthy (yep, I know what a hammy is, and mg, your smoking the wrong pencil lead if you believe I'm clueless on Practice Squad procedures). Put simply folks, this is a rookie who needs a lot of work, just like any rookie, at this moment I have him as the #5 WR with Andrews #6, but that puts him on the razor's edge with a need to make strides in his performance when he comes back. If you were a GM and cut downs start looming, you've got some guys like Childress and Kight starting to come on, what options would you be putting in the hopper? He's just another candidate until he proves himself on the practice field, BB carried some deadwood with that 5th rounder a couple years ago, a 2nd rounder in the same strait doesn't seem much different when weighing value to the team.
 
Kight played for the Packers. He is nowhere close to as good as Bam Childress.

And Reche Caldwell is terrible. He's Starks II.
 
Last edited:
Box_O_Rocks said:
Why not waived? The kid is supposed to have the talent, and maybe he'll show it when healthy (yep, I know what a hammy is, and mg, your smoking the wrong pencil lead if you believe I'm clueless on Practice Squad procedures). Put simply folks, this is a rookie who needs a lot of work, just like any rookie, at this moment I have him as the #5 WR with Andrews #6, but that puts him on the razor's edge with a need to make strides in his performance when he comes back. If you were a GM and cut downs start looming, you've got some guys like Childress and Kight starting to come on, what options would you be putting in the hopper? He's just another candidate until he proves himself on the practice field, BB carried some deadwood with that 5th rounder a couple years ago, a 2nd rounder in the same strait doesn't seem much different when weighing value to the team.

Maybe it's because they've invested a lot of hope and effort in signing him (and giving up on other options) and if they offer him on waivers he'll be gone to somebody else's roster before you can say "John Madden".

I must have missed something but why should a hamstring lead one effectively to give up on a second-round pick with high potential when the team has been prepared to hang on to plenty of less promising rookies who missed their first season through injury (e.g. Marquise Hill, Gus Scott)?
 
Last edited:
Johnny Z said:
Kight played for the Packers. He is nowhere close to as good as Bam Childress.

And Reche Caldwell is terrible. He's Starks II.


Let's see him on a real gameday with a full game under his belt before we start proclaiming him the second coming of Duane Starks (I think the better comparison would be the second coming of Donald Hayes, I guess, but whatever floats your pontoon boat).
 
Box_O_Rocks said:
Why not waived? The kid is supposed to have the talent, and maybe he'll show it when healthy (yep, I know what a hammy is, and mg, your smoking the wrong pencil lead if you believe I'm clueless on Practice Squad procedures). Put simply folks, this is a rookie who needs a lot of work, just like any rookie, at this moment I have him as the #5 WR with Andrews #6, but that puts him on the razor's edge with a need to make strides in his performance when he comes back. If you were a GM and cut downs start looming, you've got some guys like Childress and Kight starting to come on, what options would you be putting in the hopper? He's just another candidate until he proves himself on the practice field, BB carried some deadwood with that 5th rounder a couple years ago, a 2nd rounder in the same strait doesn't seem much different when weighing value to the team.

Lot of frustration showing, Box. No way this kid gets waived. BB put too much time in with Urban in Fla. If Chad can't get on the field by the end of Aug, BB will "swallow some throw-up in the back of his mouth" and IR him.
 
Johnny Z said:
And Reche Caldwell is terrible. He's Starks II.

Yeah, except the two are in no way comparable and Caldwell is far from terrible. Other than that, brilliant analysis.

I also agree that Jackson will NEVER, EVER be waived. He participated in the team walkthrough. I gotta think he'll be ready by the season opener, if not the Redskins exhibition game.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by scott99
I hope you're wrong about Jackson and the IR, I'm hoping worst case scenerio, the PUP for 6 weeks.
Box_O_Rocks said:
I don't believe he is PUP eligible, he'll either be carried on the roster, IR'd, or waived and brought back to Practice Squad - maybe.
Box - you quote a comment on Jackson being waived so you must be referring to waiving him. You can't conceivably be saying that they would ever consider for a microsecond waiving Jackson can you ?? WHAT are you saying ??
 
Last edited:
Garbanza said:
I was impressed by this guy in training camp last year. Thought he played solid when he was asked to towards the end of last year. He even played some nickle-back on the last game of the year, if I recall.

Anyway, I thought he was solid last night. Outplayed Caldwell, for sure. Is there any doubt that this man will be the new "Troy Brown" when Troy eventually retires?

Last thought: Branch needs to come back.

I was impressed with Bam in TC last year. He has worked hard and continued to improve. He deserves a spot on this time.
 
arrellbee said:
.....can't conceivably be saying that they would ever consider for a microsecond waiving Jackson can you ?? WHAT are you saying ??

microsecond .... how about a nanosecond

Whatever they do No Other team will get him.
 
arrellbee said:
Box - you quote a comment on Jackson being waived so you must be referring to waiving him. You can't conceivably be saying that they would ever consider for a microsecond waiving Jackson can you ?? WHAT are you saying ??
Bee, I'm not quoting anybody, my initial input was that he seemed to be on track for IR. Since scott99 mentioned PUP, something I believe he is now ineligible for, instead I list the three options that are left, roster, IR,or waiver and hope you can get him to the practice squad.

I'm not in love with him anymore then you are with Beisel, if both come back from the trainers and start producing well and good, if they aren't back from the trainers before the final cut down BB gets to make a decision about their potential value to the organization this year and in the future.

Folks may not want to believe the Practice Squad is an option, but that's tough. If BB wants him there to develop, then he will be waived and we'll find out if any team wants an undeveloped WR to start the season. As I've stated before, I have him as #5 of 6 WRs, with Andrews as the 6th, that is a precarious position on the depth chart.
 
Box_O_Rocks said:
I'm not in love with him anymore then you are with Beisel, if both come back from the trainers and start producing well and good, if they aren't back from the trainers before the final cut down BB gets to make a decision about their potential value to the organization this year and in the future.

Folks may not want to believe the Practice Squad is an option, but that's tough. If BB wants him there to develop, then he will be waived and we'll find out if any team wants an undeveloped WR to start the season. As I've stated before, I have him as #5 of 6 WRs, with Andrews as the 6th, that is a precarious position on the depth chart.

Wow, you really ARE saying that! You're willing to abandon a guy for whom you traded up to the high 2nd round after very close scouting, who absolutely tore up minicamp, who has a long-term affordable contract at the team's thinnest position, and whose only sin is a pulled muscle to keep your mitts on street FA Kelvin Kight?

FWIW, my estimate of the number of teams that would put in waiver claims on Chad Jackson is approx. 31.
 
my bad! I thought it was the rookie poster that suggested that we might waive Jackson with the hope of getting him back on the Practice Squad. I thought that we should have tolerance for such obvious ignorance. Surely, only ignorance of the procedures could lead anyone to suggest what is seems to be an idiotic idea.

But I was wrong. Since it is your suggestion, I needn't be so reserved. I believe that this suggestion is certainly among the top ten worst suggestions this offseason. Please explain why we would give our 2nd round draft choice to any team that wanted him (though waivers) whenever they wanted him (if they waited to get him off the Practice Squad). There may not be 31 teams that would claim him, but certainly at least 10.

Box_O_Rocks said:
Why not waived? The kid is supposed to have the talent, and maybe he'll show it when healthy (yep, I know what a hammy is, and mg, your smoking the wrong pencil lead if you believe I'm clueless on Practice Squad procedures). Put simply folks, this is a rookie who needs a lot of work, just like any rookie, at this moment I have him as the #5 WR with Andrews #6, but that puts him on the razor's edge with a need to make strides in his performance when he comes back. If you were a GM and cut downs start looming, you've got some guys like Childress and Kight starting to come on, what options would you be putting in the hopper? He's just another candidate until he proves himself on the practice field, BB carried some deadwood with that 5th rounder a couple years ago, a 2nd rounder in the same strait doesn't seem much different when weighing value to the team.
 
mgteich said:
There may not be 31 teams that would claim him, but certainly at least 10.

Probably more like 25. Jackson would go to the first team in the waiver order. This is a ridiculous suggestion.
 
Box_O_Rocks said:
Bee, I'm not quoting anybody, my initial input was that he seemed to be on track for IR. Since scott99 mentioned PUP, something I believe he is now ineligible for, instead I list the three options that are left, roster, IR,or waiver and hope you can get him to the practice squad.

I'm not in love with him anymore then you are with Beisel, if both come back from the trainers and start producing well and good, if they aren't back from the trainers before the final cut down BB gets to make a decision about their potential value to the organization this year and in the future.

Folks may not want to believe the Practice Squad is an option, but that's tough. If BB wants him there to develop, then he will be waived and we'll find out if any team wants an undeveloped WR to start the season. As I've stated before, I have him as #5 of 6 WRs, with Andrews as the 6th, that is a precarious position on the depth chart.
OH......MY......GOODNESS. There are no words ......
 
scott99 said:
If Branch & Jackson aren't there against Buffalo, I think it'll be Caldwell, Brown.Childress, Kight & Berlin (just a hunch). Not exactly a scary , imagine the 2 of them added to it, yikes !!!

God damn, that has to be the worst/weakest WR corps in the league. Luckily for us we have three TE's who are very active in the passing game (one is an all-pro) and our backs can catch the ball. However if somehow Branch returns before the season, then we may just be alright. I really don't want to have to rely on the unproven Jackson to save the day.
 
Seymour93 said:
God damn, that has to be the worst/weakest WR corps in the league. Luckily for us we have three TE's who are very active in the passing game (one is an all-pro) and our backs can catch the ball. However if somehow Branch returns before the season, then we may just be alright. I really don't want to have to rely on the unproven Jackson to save the day.
And what could be a worst/weakest CB corps than a second year 4th round pick and a rookie undrafted free agent ? No team could ever win their division (much less a superbowl) with two CBs like that.

Keep a perspective. It certainly might be a problem, but it is far from certain.
 
arrellbee said:
And what could be a worst/weakest CB corps than a second year 4th round pick and a rookie undrafted free agent ? No team could ever win their division (much less a superbowl) with two CBs like that.

Keep a perspective. It certainly might be a problem, but it is far from certain.

Thank goodness the rest of the defense bailed us out that year.

Production is going to have to signficantly increase from the QB, TE's, and backs or else the offense could be in for a long season. Let's avoid this situation if possible.
 
Box_O_Rocks said:
Jackson seems on track for IR.

I'd rank them Branch, Caldwell/Childress, Brown; If not Jackson, the battle will be between Stone, Musinski, Kight, and Berlin. I think Musinski goes back to Practice Squad as insurance. Erik Davis also seems on track for the Squad.

Caldwell and Childress ahead of Brown for wear and tear, plus development reasons, keep Troy for situational work.
Box_O_Rocks said:
I don't believe he is PUP eligible, he'll either be carried on the roster, IR'd, or waived and brought back to Practice Squad - maybe.
Box_O_Rocks said:
Why not waived? The kid is supposed to have the talent, and maybe he'll show it when healthy (yep, I know what a hammy is, and mg, your smoking the wrong pencil lead if you believe I'm clueless on Practice Squad procedures). Put simply folks, this is a rookie who needs a lot of work, just like any rookie, at this moment I have him as the #5 WR with Andrews #6, but that puts him on the razor's edge with a need to make strides in his performance when he comes back. If you were a GM and cut downs start looming, you've got some guys like Childress and Kight starting to come on, what options would you be putting in the hopper? He's just another candidate until he proves himself on the practice field, BB carried some deadwood with that 5th rounder a couple years ago, a 2nd rounder in the same strait doesn't seem much different when weighing value to the team.
patchick said:
Wow, you really ARE saying that! You're willing to abandon a guy for whom you traded up to the high 2nd round after very close scouting, who absolutely tore up minicamp, who has a long-term affordable contract at the team's thinnest position, and whose only sin is a pulled muscle to keep your mitts on street FA Kelvin Kight?

FWIW, my estimate of the number of teams that would put in waiver claims on Chad Jackson is approx. 31.
mgteich said:
my bad! I thought it was the rookie poster that suggested that we might waive Jackson with the hope of getting him back on the Practice Squad. I thought that we should have tolerance for such obvious ignorance. Surely, only ignorance of the procedures could lead anyone to suggest what is seems to be an idiotic idea.

But I was wrong. Since it is your suggestion, I needn't be so reserved. I believe that this suggestion is certainly among the top ten worst suggestions this offseason. Please explain why we would give our 2nd round draft choice to any team that wanted him (though waivers) whenever they wanted him (if they waited to get him off the Practice Squad). There may not be 31 teams that would claim him, but certainly at least 10.
I doubt a look back at what started this dialogue will edify anyone currantly in mother hen mode, but for grins and giggles lets postulate that I did not advocate waiving him to place on the practice squad as a first choice. Lets instead subscribe to the theory that I expressed an opinion (also unpleasant to some) that his currant situation seemed to have him on track for the Injured Reserve. We might even consider that later in the conversation, I listed what appear to be the three options available for dealing with him as an unproven, apparently talented, injured player whom we would wish to retain. That folks would key on the more difficult option should not have surprised me, my bad for speakly frankly and not donning my Peyton Manning approved kneepads to worship at the feet of the dollar sign. How foolish of me to consider Free Agent castoff's, who are developing within the system, to be worthy of evaluation alongside an expensive two draft pick rookie. Perhaps I should also wish we had not misplaced valuable second round talents Adrian Klemm and Bethel Johnson.

Until Jackson is on the practice field he is a line item on the roster. Reportedly his talent is such that he should be given every opportunity to demonstrate his value to the team; if Bethel is the standard he will probably get three years to do so, with the caveat that Bethel earned a Special Teams slot in Training Camp his rookie year, Jackson has yet to do as much.

mg/pc, perhaps you could offer an alternative WR roster to the one I projected, here is mine again to refresh your memory: Branch, Caldwell/Childress, Brown; If not Jackson, the battle will be between Stone, Musinski, Kight, and Berlin. I think Musinski goes back to Practice Squad as insurance. Erik Davis also seems on track for the Squad.

To further annoy you, I'll explain my reasoning; I based this list on BB's remark prior to the Arizona game, claiming he had 40 spots on the roster penciled in with known roles on the team. Branch's #1 status (if he gets his mind right) is pretty clear. I see Caldwell as another David Patton and Childress as a younger Troy Brown, neither quite up to a #2, but good situational options, Troy himself is a finite and very valuable resource, husbanded for specific needs. Finally, I have my developmental/warm body slot on the roster, Jackson. I have also stated that I'd carry Andrews as my #6, to my mind he has earned a Special Teams role (PR/Gunner/KO coverage/secondary KR) and a reserve DB role (but only because he is being carried for Special Teams).

I look forward to learning how you would assign roles on the WR roster.

R/Box
 
all I know is that there is NO WAY jackson will be waived... and your long explanation in that last post did nothing but confuse me while trying to read and work at the same time.
hopefully Bam can fill in as our #4 or 5 WR.
Branch (hopefully sooner than later), Brown, Caldwell, Jackson, Bam, fill in #5
 
Patti37 said:
I was impressed with Bam in TC last year. He has worked hard and continued to improve. He deserves a spot on this time.

Yes...There were a few of us who liked what we saw of him last year....you were on the positive side of that, as was I. But, there were some so-called experts who really haven't a clue to seeing hidden talent until it stares them right in the face. Sad that some used to thread to ridicule in a condescending manner....ahem right MG?

FROM EARLIER IN MARCH.
http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/showthread.php?t=32507
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 6 – A Week Before the Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
MORSE: Pre-Draft Patriots News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
Mark Morse
1 week ago
Patriots Part Ways with Another Linebacker as Offseason Roster Shake-Up Continues
Patriots News 04-05, Mock Draft 2.0, Patriots Look For OL Depth
MORSE: 18 Game Schedule and Other Patriots Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference at the League Meetings 3/31
MORSE: Smokescreens and Misinformation Leading Up to Patriots Draft
Back
Top