lurker1965
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2009
- Messages
- 3,132
- Reaction score
- 1,105
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Quite common, particularly with surnames from eastern Europe. For instance, the Polish language doesn't have a "v", so the "w" is pronounced like a "v", as in German. So it's "Gronkovski" in Polish - but "Gronk" will do just about anywhere in the world.
If Americans have been pronouncing Scandinavian names incorrectly and Scandinavians have been pronouncing Americans names incorrectly the question is who is really incorrect or does it really matter?
Sincerely,
Antony 2046
There's no right or wrong. It all depends how each person wants to be called. And however they want to be called should be respected and done.
Bill-EECH-ich...and Tommy...Chong?Well, that's not how you'd pronounce Bili?i? in Croatian, anyways. Both c's with diacritics above them are pronounced as ch's. Assuming the second syllable is stressed, that i would be pronounced closer to the i in "police" than in "sit" and would not morph to a schwa. So it's more like Bill-EECH-ich. But the name was anglicized and is pronounced the way it's pronounced; it's not like we're saying Brady like Brádaigh is correctly pronounced either.
Then why aren't they both spelled "ch"? Why spell them differently from "ch" and differently from each other?Both c's with diacritics above them are pronounced as ch's.
Halberstam’s book adds that the spelling of Bilicic was changed by a first-grade teacher who had the family in her class in Pennsylvania.
| 156 | 6K |
| 46 | 2K |
| 24 | 867 |
| 6 | 560 |
| 18 | 565 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
May 2 - May 17 (Through 26yrs)











