patsox23
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 7,430
- Reaction score
- 60
It has been proposed that we could go to a 4-3 base.
Thoughts?
Oh God. Please stop the madness. We're NOT going to a 4-3 base. Ever.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It has been proposed that we could go to a 4-3 base.
Thoughts?
Oh God. Please stop the madness. We're NOT going to a 4-3 base. Ever.
All I know is that we get to the QB more in the 4-3 than in the 3-4 ... and that makes me happy. The 4-3 allows Wilfork to pressure the middle like a 1-gap player ... QB's get flushed to the side alot ... I like our 4-3 ... always have.
Yeah, but everybody sucks less at something.
That's a truly inspirational quote.
Makes me want to put it in one of those huge poster things they put in offices.
You've got Wilfork playing in the four-three? Who do you sit, Warren or Seymour?
In the 4-3, I would have Warren and Wilfork in the middle, and Seymour and Green at the ends. Wright and Smith can backup anywhere on the DL. AD and Vrabel are the OLB's and Bruschi/Seau sharing time as the MLB. This could indeed put a lot of pressure on the QB.
Who are your two outside pass rushers? Also in the four three one of the ends has to cover sometimes, Seymour or Green? In most 4-3s all four of them would be tackles. Jarvis Green is closer to 300 lbs. than he is to the average pass rushing DE.
Jason Taykor 255 Dwight Freeney 268.
You have to think a line of Green, Warren, Wilfork and Seymour would wear the hell out of an offensive line and get a lot of pressure as well as stuff the run.
I can imagine these 4 playing 1 gap instead of 2 and just overpowering offensive lineman as they rush the passer. Yeah they would be slow, but the brute strength would be impressive.
| 20 | 626 |
| 95 | 14K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
May 24 - June 8 (Through 26yrs)










