- Joined
- May 31, 2016
- Messages
- 16,566
- Reaction score
- 28,676
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
Quite the company.
Are you talking about Horn or Surtain? I’m guessing Horn.He's very good against larger receivers. Best tape I've seen against Pitts, too. But don't put him inside or against shifty guys. He can be a Ramsey or Sherman type. Depending on what we do at QB/LB, he should be on the short list at 15, if he makes it past Dallas.
Horn. Surtain seems to struggle some in man to man against shiftier receivers, although I could see him flourishing as a boundary corner and a safety. They both perform their best against bigger receivers, though, at least from what I've seen.Are you talking about Horn or Surtain? I’m guessing Horn.
That's why im higher on farley. WR like Hill Anderson can be a extrem threat and if I go high with CB i'd like to see that deep coverage skills.Horn. Surtain seems to struggle some in man to man against shiftier receivers, although I could see him flourishing as a boundary corner and a safety. They both perform their best against bigger receivers, though, at least from what I've seen.
That's why im higher on farley. WR like Hill Anderson can be a extrem threat and if I go high with CB i'd like to see that deep coverage skills.
I like Stokes as well. Would be a good second rd. pick imo. Has played well and good athletic. I just think Farley brings some hands ball tracking with his Size coombined to his speed that is rareI mostly agree, but their technique is much better than Farley's. His speed is special, though. He has closing burst like few other players at his position. I don't think he's quite there yet with his technique, however. I'd rather trade down and take Stokes in the 50 - 80 range than Farley in the 10 - 20 range, but that's just me.