Lavictoire
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2010
- Messages
- 1,920
- Reaction score
- 2,334
I was hoping somebody might chime in with a rule change that they might have missed.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
I was hoping somebody might chime in with a rule change that they might have missed.
And failed, although they succeeded in satisfying most of the population's belief in propaganda.
They've got a million dollar study by Top Men. No way it's IGL. No waaaay...
Funny, they announced that they were going to check the balls in cold weather games but never released the results.. Strange...
My favorite part of the whole thing was how the criminal mastermind -- a temporary ballboy making $8.50 an hour, who goes by the name of Bird, a grown man making teenage Doritos Dink jokes, this guy spent 6 hours a day over 2 days locked in a room with FBI investigators, and he outsmarted them all! He fooled them. He doesn't appear ANYWHERE in the report other than taking the balls into the rest room.
There are certainly more things he innovated that league either copied (or OUTLAWED LOL) but I m not sure if all could be called „rule changes“. A true list I bet would be two pages, but many would be considered minutiae maybe.
He was here too. Brady is Santa Claus
Amateur physicists everywhere tried to use the Ideal Gas Law to calculate the pressure and all made the same mistake of forgetting that the air pressure gauges measure the difference from ambient atmospheric pressure, not the absolute pressure, so they all thought the measured pressures were way too low confirming the NFL's idiocy.
Didn’t matter though since the NFL cited a rule, that held up in court, that they can do whatever they want with league members.
Yup. The initial ruling was about whether Brady was treated fair and whether the NFL legitimately found him guilty. The appeals were about the CBA's strength for the league being able to handle any offense however they wanted without outside interference undermining it.
The Appellate Court did a sloppy job. I remember a legal analyst said that, YES, the NFL can do what they want, but not if they're lying and there's fraud. The first judge ruled correctly. The problem is that the Appellate judges didn't bother to even read the case. That was clear when one of the judges spouted things that were proven false in the actual decision. Clearly he hadn't read it.
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)
