lancerman
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- May 28, 2017
- Messages
- 12,936
- Reaction score
- 15,836
Vinatieri lost simply because of recency bias. Edelman played a more important position, but Vinatieri had more iconic moments in big games and is the GOAT kicker. Really only Brady, Gronk and Hannah should be ahead of him in a clear cut situation. But Edelman is sort of Mr. Patriots and was the all in guy during the most recent part of the dynasty. But I can let that go, it's not the most important thing.I thought Edelman v Vinatieri was a microcosm of the issues older players face... maybe I didn't make the point succinctly enough? Overall a fair criticism i suppose, but i thought it was fairly illustrative of the point i was trying to make...
I don't think Kraft needs to step in to just "put guys in"... I like that the fans get to participate in the process...
Parcells was way too controversial to win any sort of vote and objectively did enough damage to undermine any positive case he had. Kraft knew that. He knew for a fact Parcells wouldn't get in. He also knew that there were old fart reporters in the media that loved Parcells and they were his biggest champions and constantly do a lot to cheerlead his "contributions". So Kraft stepped in because he's desperate for the media to get behind him for the Football HOF.
Frankly it's embarrassing. What kind of franchise honors a man who literally announced to the whole world he was bailing on the team for a division rival (in fact, the most hated rival we have in the division) before the biggest game this franchise ever played at the time and also screwed us out of our best player at the time? It's hard to imagine any team doing that besides one with a thirsty owner who wants to kiss up to as many people in power so he can be validated before he dies.











