WHY are we still talking about this so passionately, however you choose to judge Boutte's skill level, the fact remains that Boutte would have been a REDUNANT player who had 2 players with a similar skill set that were BETTER than him. One THIS year's Pats team Boutte would have been relegated to a role of quality depth.
This role would have been further complicated by the fact that Mike wants to emphasize the run more and use a FB so 3 WR formations would likely be on the field for fewer snaps than last year and all that applies to the WR room. PLUS, having Boutte on the offense would further limit the development of Kyle Williams who has a much higher ceiling and a more dangerous skill set than Boutte. Plus, the emergence of Chism, DeGennaro, and others made Boutte
There is a REASON why Boutte only had 33 receptions last season. We all know what he is on the positive side, BUT he also is a guy who doesn't separate well. He doesn't isn't particularly big, and his YAC is literally disgraceful. If you need a solid guy who can win contested catch battles, Boutte is your guy. He is an asset to any WR room, but never the guy who stirs the drink. William COULD end up being that kind of guy, and having Boutte on the roster holds back his development.
Granted I would rather have had a LB or edge and a 2027 6th, but the more I get to know Reed, the more I see the logic. As he develops, he could add depth and position flexibility to defense as well as ST's.
Nothing I have written hasn't already been said ad nauseum. No need to get pissed at each other. The bottom line here is the deal is done. Let's see at the end of the season, and see what the 2 players have added to their teams.