Everybody would like more money. He'll have more money with his next contract. So sure.
Finally, common ground and common sense.
Either way, I don't think the trade surprised anybody.
See I didn't see his, Wolf's, or Vrabes' press conference on it. I saw it reported in the sports media but not sourced... sort of "sources say" stuff. Again, I'm not shocked and I doubt Boutte is. I'm still not 100% sure who wanted the divorce, but what's important at this point is we don't have to somehow pay him alimony
You think it’s fake news when the Patriots traded for Brown, signed Doubs with money Boutte thinks was his that he wanted out?
Is that really hard to believe?
More like, might have thought he could work in with the existing group. Doubs and Brown have been there a while. The point isn't that he'd be a no. 1 or 2 WR., but that he'd be a no. 3 receiver. this year, for no. 3 money. And WRs get hurt.
He wouldn’t be #3. That was the problem… and regardless of position…. he still wanted a new contract and didn’t want to play without one.
Look, someone was going to be gone. I thought we'd lose either Chism or Williams. Looks like there's faith that we have a path forward inside and outside. Or maybe we only want to keep 5.
The receivers coming up behind Boutte were better, younger, cheaper.
Ok. Tell me what other starting receiver was traded for a guy with this thin a resume and a 7 not in the upcoming draft. but in the next year's draft. The point isn't WAHHHHH KEEP MY BINKIE, it's more like "how low can you go."
There’s a bunch of guys starting who shouldn’t be.
They were going to cut somebody. I didn't have the conversations with Pats management or see their press release on who.
They traded Boutte for an old kicking tee and a pack of sweat socks, it was never in doubt who.
Not to get testy, but you have trouble with statements like "If anything, he is more proven after three years of good performance."
No, I just don’t think 500+ yards receiving is anything to write home about.
It's not so much just that I type a lot. It's also that you don't have patience for reading.
Brevity is the soul of wit.
A victim of the new age, I'm afraid. A better attribution would be that I naturally enjoy the language that appears to pose such an impediment to you.
It’s not an impediment, it’s too wordy.
It's absolutely legit to call into question the trade value the team received in exchange for Boutte -- Or Boutte's contract., if you like.
Sure… but many here had silly expectations.
We got bupkes, based on the knowns. I am assuming that our side sees some value in Reed. That value is an unknown to me. It does not show up in his resume to date. It might show up in our team's evaluation of him.
Both teams traded a player that, if they couldn’t trade him, they were going to cut him. The Pats did pretty well.
But your argument seems to be that we did fine even if Reed sucks.
Vetting degrees of well depending on how good Reed is, they still got a 7th.
Did I miss it, or did you make an argument asserting his value in the trade?
I made up a theoretical scenario to explain why the trade value was lower than you expected.
Or was the argument that the value part was the 7th rounder in 2028?
Value was getting something at all. A highly valued player has a bigger market.
Do you think Reed's good but we don't know it?
Don’t know.
Do you think that a 7th round pick in 2028 is good compensation?
Player and pick are good compensation.
Or do you think we accepted very low value perceiving ourselves to be over a barrel?
I think some Patriot fans severely overrated Boutte.