- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 73,256
- Reaction score
- 22,940
Does he though? 3 games in 2 years.He does miss a lot of games. I have no idea if that's more than a typical player.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Does he though? 3 games in 2 years.He does miss a lot of games. I have no idea if that's more than a typical player.
Those are good numbers however once you look into the volume it becomes far less impressive. He has some good plays, but longterm he contributes at a high 3 or very low 2 depending. The bigger issue is the WR makeup on the team. He's redundant with Williams. So the issue is give up on the younger and faster Williams or give up on someone else like Hollins who fills a unique role and have Williams and Boutte eat up each others targets and eventually you let one walk.He caught 72% of his targets in an average depth of throw of 17.6. Those are INSANE numbers.
Having that threat drawing coverage with Brown and Doubs getting extra targets is his you build a damn passing game. Instead we have nice guy Hollins who can get a target now and then as an “afterthought”
Your right. I was absolutely being hyperbolicI think "burned" is being tossed around a little liberally here....yes he made two TD catches on Stingly, but Stingly was right there both times, KB just made tough contested catches.....this isn't Moss throwing his hand up as he leaves the line.....this isn't even Williams's TD the other night where he got vertical separation on his receiver .
And he's going to be a valuable guy moving the chains on 3rd downs. Like Welker and Edelman he has the ability to find the holes in defenses, has excellent hands, and is as tough as they get.
I see Reed in competition with Dell Pettus, Mike Brown, John Saunders and Peter Manuma for one, maybe two roster spots.I could see Reed as a big nickel/dime type player. Not much smaller than Khalil Jacobs, but faster.
Boutte was NOT worth a 4th to other than pats message board fans. So, let us consider that he was worht a 5th or 6th to someone during the next week.Looks like Reed is already a player. People are not looking past his sixth round draft status.
As a rookie last year he started on PUP, was activated to the roster in late October and played in seven games, starting one, before going on IR. Was brought back from IR and started both playoff games.
His line against Buffalo: 12 tackles, 9 of them solo, plus a fumble recovered. If he does that well against the Bills for us I’ll be happy.
Pettus is average and I think Vrabes expected more from BrownApparently, Vrabel doesn't like this backup safety options. Did Pettus, Brown and Saunders really look that bad to Vrabel?
I suspect that Drake has lots of trust in Brown, Doubs, Hollins and Henry.....bingo.
Please list all the teams that offered a LB for Boutte.We only have 1.5 LBs so we are going back to BB's big nickel. 5 safties at a time. Who needs a LB?
Yes. That totally makes sense. Unless you ignore the fact that picks in later years have lesser value then picks currently. A 2025 pick 6 round pick is a UDFA equivalent in 2023.
Yep. I heard this earlier in the off-season that teams are going to try to copy Seattle.Bedard said a 5th.
There is a movement in the league to a 3-safety package ("Big Nickel"), particularly against the increasingly prevalent 12 personnel. Maybe that's the angle here. Reed has decent size and is fast, and we haven't been able to cover TEs for years now.
(And most here are forgetting Boutte is a 1-year rental who still needs to be paid, while Reed is cheap and under contract for a few more years).
The Advantages of the Seahawks Big Nickel Defense vs 12 Personnel
The Big Nickel defense is a 4-2-5 scheme using a third safety (hybrid) instead of a traditional cornerback in the slot or a 3rd LB to provide better run support and coverage against "12" personnel (2 TEs).coachkoufootball.substack.com
Reed is an upgrade and will our #3 safety for Game One, and might start if Woodson cannot.Pettus is average and I think Vrabes expected more from Brown
This is not the way to look at things.Boutte was NOT worth a 4th to other than pats message board fans. So, let us consider that he was worht a 5th or 6th to someone during the next week.
So, the alternative was likely seen as a 5th or 6th before Game 1 or this trade. Ignore the pick. The team wanted the backup safety for a 5th or 6th. Sure, it might be more understandable to see if we could get the 5th next week, and trade him to an NFC team for a 6th if we couldn't do better.
Apparently, the team filled one of our roster spots: backup safety who plays a lot of special teams. Noe the open is question is whether we want to keep an additional backup safety, choosing from Pettus, Saunders and Brown. Boutte did NOT fill a roster need.
But that was his role. He drew coverage and was not targetted often and was very effective when targetted. Take the top off.Those are good numbers however once you look into the volume it becomes far less impressive. He has some good plays, but longterm he contributes at a high 3 or very low 2 depending. The bigger issue is the WR makeup on the team. He's redundant with Williams. So the issue is give up on the younger and faster Williams or give up on someone else like Hollins who fills a unique role and have Williams and Boutte eat up each others targets and eventually you let one walk.
I dunno, lots of folk have been dissing Reed because he was drafted in the sixth round. I’m just pointing out that Boutte was also picked in the sixth so deserves the same respect or lack thereof if you’re going to judge by where they were picked.What does where we picked Boutte 3 years ago have to do with anything?
Would trading Puka Nucua for a 5th be an even trade because he was taken in the 5th rd of the draft 3 years ago?
This is the PatsFans message board. We are random old dudes posting. You think I am part of the Patriots GM office?Please list all the teams that offered a LB for Boutte.
| 130 | 14K |
| 200 | 6K |
| 27 | 2K |
| 212 | 16K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
August 10 - August 25 (Through 26yrs)











