Why not 7 WR's on the opening day roster?

[Wozzy]

Lots of players are ruined by being mishandled when they’re young.

You’re usually better than this, but this time you’re laying a real clinker.

You think Doug Marrone and Vrabel are going to ruin him… sounds legit.

 

[Ring 6]

FIFY. Apart from timeframe you’re right, and my point is that we are constructing the roster for this year not for eternity.

To say we want to keep 7 WRs is to say we are collecting talent not building a team designed to win. We’d be keeping receivers just because we think they’re good or are going to be good someday, not because they give us the best offense for winning now and sustaining that winning into next year. Sustaining it into next year is what makes it tricky, because of expiring contracts.

Part of the problem may be that we are thin at other positions especially backup so there are no players for fans to be excited about keeping. Plus those other positions aren’t as exciting as WR. So we have fans wanting to collect WR talent not building a winning team. It’s the Madden Fantasy Football effect, in real life.

I’m not disagreeing but I am also saying if you had confidence that a WR was a great future prospect you wouldn’t fear having him as WR6 and need to keep him as a 7

 

[Family]

Plus those other positions aren’t as exciting as WR. So we have fans wanting to collect WR talent not building a winning team. It’s the Madden Fantasy Football effect, in real life.

It has nothing to do with that.

The team will pick 1 bottom of the roster development project between Crownover, Chism, Arkin etc. If they produce this year, that's great. But it doesn't matter the position because none of them will likely matter this season.

Position factored into this decision pre-covid when it wasn't so easy finding and bringing an experienced veteran off the squad easily.

 

[Wozzy]

DeGennaro wouldn't be more than a development project like Chism/Williams last year. He wouldn't replace Boutte.

DeGennaro wouldn’t replace Boutte, Williams would replace Boutte, Nick would replace Williams.

I agreed with your point of trading Boutte before training camp, but the strongest part of your argument is gone. Boutte has been a great teammate, not a malcontent. He has no problem being here.

The strongest past of my argument was Boutte wanting to play to get paid is still there.

It would be crazy to trade Boutte now unless we win the exchange.

It would be crazy not to trade him if Williams, DeGennaro and maybe another UDFA look good. Brown on one side, Doubs on the other, Douglas in the slot… Boutte would be 4th on the depth chart and annoyed he isn’t playing enough in a contract year, then it would be crazy to lose him next year for nothing when you could have gotten a late round pick for next offseason.

 

[Family]

It would be crazy not to trade him if Williams, DeGennaro and maybe another UDFA look good. Brown on one side, Doubs on the other, Douglas in the slot… Boutte would be 4th on the depth chart and annoyed he isn’t playing enough in a contract year, then it would be crazy to lose him next year for nothing when you could have gotten a late round pick for next offseason.

Maye seems to throw high, so maybe it's not surprising Williams and Douglas has struggled with them. Maybe it';s not a coincidence.

You can get more for Boutte once the season starts, while others are getting hurt or discovering their players are disappointments. Boutte getting annoyed and being a problem is in your head, not reality.

During that time we will see how Douglas does. I'd rather have Boutte around while we find out.

 

[n1997y]

You think Doug Marrone and Vrabel are going to ruin him… sounds legit.

No, I don’t think they’ll ruin him, because I don’t think they’ll take your advice. That’s what would ruin him.

I expect him to practice and eventually play better. We’re halfway through camp, a fair amount of time to improve.

Hopefully he will improve. When he does it might be worth taking a look at him at backup guard, depending on how that needs to be stands by then. But for now let him focus on one thing, his traditional position.

 

[n1997y]

It has nothing to do with that.

The team will pick 1 bottom of the roster development project between Crownover, Chism, Arkin etc. If they produce this year, that's great. But it doesn't matter the position because none of them will likely matter this season.

Position factored into this decision pre-covid when it wasn't so easy finding and bringing an experienced veteran off the squad easily.

Agree that the evolving PS rules have changed how this is handled now. It’s still a choice to have those development projects on the PS not on the roster, albeit at the risk of waiver claims trying to get them moved over to the PS.

 

[Ring 6]

DeGennaro wouldn’t replace Boutte, Williams would replace Boutte, Nick would replace Williams.

The strongest past of my argument was Boutte wanting to play to get paid is still there.

It would be crazy not to trade him if Williams, DeGennaro and maybe another UDFA look good. Brown on one side, Doubs on the other, Douglas in the slot… Boutte would be 4th on the depth chart and annoyed he isn’t playing enough in a contract year, then it would be crazy to lose him next year for nothing when you could have gotten a late round pick for next offseason.

The 3 WRs in the base offense are Brown, Doubs, Boutte.

 

[mgteich]

That's fair.
Big athletic kid, I'm sure he could play some OG with some more reps.

why?

 

[mgteich]

That's basically the decision. Keep a Crownover or a 7th WR to develop.

Also how Dippre looks because without a trade, I don't think one of those 3rd TE's is staying.

It's really who has the most potential regardless of position. That's sort of the point of the thread.

Arkin says hello

 

[Family]

Arkin says hello

You're right to mention him too, but I think he's too Ryan Izoish, not really talented.

I suppose he could hang around. I just think the team will choose other options, or just go with 7 WRs.

 

[mgteich]

The 3 WRs in the base offense are Brown, Doubs, Boutte.

With Hollins as #4 and Williams as a developmental WR who is OK as our #5 WR (even if he almost never plays).
===============================
I see no reason to use a roster spot on a 6th WR, unless the staff really want a 2nd developmental WR because Williams has shown almost nothing yet (which is OK since WR's often take a 2nd year to develop working for Josh).

 

[mgteich]

You're right to mention him too, but I think he's too Ryan Izoish, not really talented.

I suppose he could hang around. I just think the team will choose other options, or just go with 7 WRs.

I suspect that Josh wants to have a blocking TE on the team. Vrabel indicated that we needed to have someone to fill Hill's role.

To be clear, I'd rather than have a 7th WR for the season, I would rather have any of these options
1) QB 3
2) TE 3
3) OT 5
4) IOL 5
5) an additional DL
6) an additional LB
7) an additional safety
8) an additional special teamer

 

[Family]

I suspect that Josh wants to have a blocking TE on the team. Vrabel indicated that we needed to have someone to fill Hill's role.

To be clear, I'd rather than have a 7th WR for the season, I would rather have any of these options
1) QB 3
2) TE 3
3) OT 5
4) IOL 5
5) an additional DL
6) an additional LB
7) an additional safety
8) an additional special teamer

I'm unclear what you mean from 5 on, but agree with the first four.

So how may WR's?

 

[Family]

Agree that the evolving PS rules have changed how this is handled now. It’s still a choice to have those development projects on the PS not on the roster, albeit at the risk of waiver claims trying to get them moved over to the PS.

They definitely would lose Williams, Chism is maybe 50/50, and Crownover is probably not.

It really depends on how the later two look in joint practices, and games to other teams.

The team will protect the ones they like who they could lose like Bryant, Chism, and Wallace last year. Everyone knew from game one these were amongst the roster members least likely to succeed that season. They were there for development.

Of course they will prefer it split amongst positions, but there might be other factors.

 

[Ring 6]

With Hollins as #4 and Williams as a developmental WR who is OK as our #5 WR (even if he almost never plays).
===============================
I see no reason to use a roster spot on a 6th WR, unless the staff really want a 2nd developmental WR because Williams has shown almost nothing yet (which is OK since WR's often take a 2nd year to develop working for Josh).

Williams should be # 4.
He did fine as a rookie and needs reps. You can’t sit him on the bench to okay Hollins.

 

[Ring 6]

They definitely would lose Williams, Chism is maybe 50/50, and Crownover is probably not.

It really depends on how the later two look in joint practices, and games to other teams.

The team will protect the ones they like who they could lose like Bryant, Chism, and Wallace last year. Everyone knew from game one these were amongst the roster members least likely to succeed that season. They were there for development.

Of course they will prefer it split amongst positions, but there might be other factors.

Not sure Bryant or Wallace were necessarily kept because they liked them more so than there was no one else at the position that didn’t suck. They would have sent them packing if they have a real nfl caliber player to keep instead.

 

[Ring 6]

I suspect that Josh wants to have a blocking TE on the team. Vrabel indicated that we needed to have someone to fill Hill's role.

To be clear, I'd rather than have a 7th WR for the season, I would rather have any of these options
1) QB 3
2) TE 3
3) OT 5
4) IOL 5
5) an additional DL
6) an additional LB
7) an additional safety
8) an additional special teamer

This is a consideration. When the players we are relying on for depth at a position are shaky that’s a huge reason to keep extra players at that spot.
At LB for example we will be choosing among unknowns. It’s a good plan to keep 2 unknowns instead of one by using the last roster spots, esp since it will be a close call at cutdown at LB
But WRs get fantasy points so some fans think they are the most important position on the team.

 

[DoubleDeluxe]

why?

It’s easier to play OG than OT assuming you have the necessary size. You really going to argue that?