Stefon Diggs baby mama'S.

[bruinator]

Read this article and wondered how big of an idiot this guy is:

Stefon Diggs Now Has 6 Kids, Including 4 Born in 2025 | NESN

Diggs had an eventful year during his time with the New England Patriots.

nesn.com

 

[Pape]

time to

 

[1960Pats]

Read this article and wondered how big of an idiot this guy is:

Stefon Diggs Now Has 6 Kids, Including 4 Born in 2025 | NESN

Diggs had an eventful year during his time with the New England Patriots.

nesn.com

I had a video of a talk show, hosted by a woman named Iyanla Vanzant, who had 6 young men on who had 87 children with 50 different women. One of the "men" had 24 children. I can't seem to locate the video but I know I posted it here some time ago. I actually found the video but it was just about unwatchable because of political ads. It was a show called Iyanla: Fix My Life from 2014.

Edit 1: One of the men did have 24 children but he was second. The lead character in the clown show had 34 children. That means that two of them had 58 kids and the other four combined had 29.

Edit 2: For those of you who think it's no problem, I watched a follow up of the show and one of the "men" had two 11 year old kids. When he went to see one of them she was a total wreck and he walked out rather than try and soothe the girls pain.

 

[Tunescribe]

Read this article and wondered how big of an idiot this guy is:

Stefon Diggs Now Has 6 Kids, Including 4 Born in 2025 | NESN

Diggs had an eventful year during his time with the New England Patriots.

nesn.com

FOUR born in 2025?! That is mind-blowing. (Actually, some prudent blowing could've prevented all that.) I wonder if dad was present for the deliveries.

The logistics going forward promise to be complex.

 

[TheRainMaker]

No wonder he rejected the Pats pay cut.

 

[Wozzy]

Moving on from Diggs was smart. He was always a hot potato and in danger of doing something stupid.

 

[reflexblue]

He better get signed with all these kids to feed

 

[n1997y]

All of them and he could still manage his personal chef as a side piece ?

I’m impressed!

 

[n1997y]

FOUR born in 2025?! That is mind-blowing. (Actually, some prudent blowing could've prevented all that.) I wonder if dad was present for the deliveries.

The logistics going forward promise to be complex.

What logistics?

Fire and forget, baby!

 

[reflexblue]

All of them and he could still manage his personal chef as a side piece ?

I’m impressed!

He does get around

 

[Tunescribe]

What logistics?

Fire and forget, baby!

Right. Forget until four (or more) lawyers come knocking, palms-up hands outstretched.

 

[One-If-By-Sea]

It's the women too. Why do they knowingly want to raise a kid by themselves?

Dysfunctional by both parties on multiple levels.

 

[Vindicate]

I mean if he pays child support, the kinds are taken care of, and the women are fine with the situation, how does that merit any of our input at all? If they're happy, they're happy.

 

[Tunescribe]

It's the women too. Why do they knowingly want to raise a kid by themselves?

$$$$$$$

Dysfunctional by both parties on multiple levels.

From our perspective, yes. They are part of a different culture/value system.

 

[Pape]

Anyone else think he's gonna be broke shortly after his playing days are over?

 

[ctpatsfan77]

FOUR born in 2025?! That is mind-blowing. (Actually, some prudent blowing could've prevented all that.) I wonder if dad was present for the deliveries.

The logistics going forward promise to be complex.

Two thoughts:

(1) Most of his, um, carousing happened in 2024, not after he signed with NE.
(2) Antonio Cromartie of JEST fame had a vasectomy . . . and still managed to father more kids.

 

[1960Pats]

It's the women too. Why do they knowingly want to raise a kid by themselves?

Dysfunctional by both parties on multiple levels.

The welfare system is designed to encourage women to have kids without fathers around. I saw a 60 Minutes show many years ago about a married couple in Boston with kids, a firefighter and police officer, who got a divorce because it was better financially.

 

[1960Pats]

I mean if he pays child support, the kinds are taken care of, and the women are fine with the situation, how does that merit any of our input at all? If they're happy, they're happy.

That's way off the mark. Kids being raised without fathers are far more likely to have problems than kids from solid homes.

The reason the women like it is because the system was designed to reward them and keep them under the thumb of the government. And it's working like a charm for everyone but the kids.

 

[EddardSnow67]

The welfare system is designed to encourage women to have kids without fathers around. I saw a 60 Minutes show many years ago about a married couple in Boston with kids, a firefighter and police officer, who got a divorce because it was better financially.

Can you prove this? Because the data actually says otherwise. The welfare system doesn't play a significant role in influencing the rate of single vs. two parent households, according to research.

So while there surely are *some* women who have kids with the intent of getting more benefits and have no desire to have the father in the picture, in reality, most single parents are not single parents by choice.

In fact, something like our massive, racist prison industrial complex contributes more to the rate of single parent households.

But there are a lot of factors involved here and blaming a single social factor is pretty myopic.

 

[FreeTedWilliams]

Can you prove this? Because the data actually says otherwise. The welfare system doesn't play a significant role in influencing the rate of single vs. two parent households, according to research.

So while there surely are *some* women who have kids with the intent of getting more benefits and have no desire to have the father in the picture, in reality, most single parents are not single parents by choice.

In fact, something like our massive, racist prison industrial complex contributes more to the rate of single parent households.

But there are a lot of factors involved here and blaming a single social factor is pretty myopic.

If you stopped paying them to have kids, they would stop having kids they can't afford.