You realize the Washington Commanders got to the NFC Championship two seasons ago then went 5-12 last season?
As the old saying goes, past performance is no indicator of future returns.
Our defensive starters gave up 29 in the Super Bowl and IMO it was because they were outclassed.
The team may or may not find better replacements for the role players in the draft.
I hope they see it this way, but I have reasons to see why they won't.
The dead cap hit for trading him is massive.
They very well might keep him around and try to manage the situation rather than accepting less than a first.
I don't see why WR is that big a need.
Sure if WR is BPA when they are on the clock, they take one.
Yet if OL/DL/EDGE/ILB is BPA, they go that way instead.