- Joined
- Dec 21, 2007
- Messages
- 27,092
- Reaction score
- 22,053
Yes, we can hope that we become the team of over 20 years ago.
Or we can hope for a loss so that the team that had shown no signs of needing a humbling gets humbled. For no apparent reason
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Yes, we can hope that we become the team of over 20 years ago.
Shane Steichen in Indianapolis can stake a claim to it as well. It's going to depend if the voters want to reward a newer face or go back to a guy who's already won once. Belichick won it in 2003, '07 and 2010. It could be argued that he could have won it any other year, and might be easier to say which years he shouldn't have won it. My point is that voters are fickle and they'll vote for whatever flavor du jour is trendy at the time.It'll be one hell of a coaching job if we don't lose one of the Buff/Bal games and don't also lose one of those games that we should win in some sort of road flukey ****.
No idea how voters go, but 14-3 should make Vrabel the consensus COTY. Even 13-4 is such a heroic turnaround I think he deserves it but I feel like we historically don't get those kinda votes for some reason. Like Brady getting so few MVPs.
A recent picture of the Chiefs.Denver's luck is going to run: glad they exorcised the Ghost of Patrick Mahomes yesterday. But that's as far as they will go: their Offense is kind of anemic. We have the Offense that would give their D some problems.
No one hopes for a lossOr we can hope for a loss so that the team that had shown no signs of needing a humbling gets humbled. For no apparent reason
No one hopes for a loss
We all want us to continue to win and cash in on our 10-14% chance to play in the SB.
Skip Bayless said Drake Maye is/will be great. But it's unlikely they win a SB this season. They need to know what it feels like to lose before winning. "Pay their dues" type thing. He acknowledged that the Patriots will likely be a SB caliber team sooner than later.Yes, I'd prefer another reg season loss before the playoffs than just wins honestly. Getting humbled when it counts less is best. They're a very young, playoff inexperienced team, and more than likely they will stumble in the playoffs and will not be SB champs. My usual bet is that a young team won't win the champ their first year in the playoffs, it's just a stepping stone. With this theory it would be good to get humbled a bit before playoffs
That is true.I think the only way a loss ever "helps" is if the team needs a wake up call and something to galvanize them. That does not appear to be the case for this year, who still feel fueled by the last few bad years and then Vrabel seems to really instill a "day by day focus" type of culture and getting enjoyment out of that. So I'm inclined to say that a loss doesn't really do anything for us than potentially nuke our chances at homefield and maybe even the division because it's very tight on both fronts.
I never insinuated the Patriots need a loss. I asked if a loss would be good/bad in terms of the psychology aspect. It's something I thought alot about in general with sports.Or we can hope for a loss so that the team that had shown no signs of needing a humbling gets humbled. For no apparent rereason
COTY usually goes to a HC who gets more out of a team than expected. It's why Reid never wins. The team is expected to succeed.Shane Steichen in Indianapolis can stake a claim to it as well. It's going to depend if the voters want to reward a newer face or go back to a guy who's already won once. Belichick won it in 2003, '07 and 2010. It could be argued that he could have won it any other year, and might be easier to say which years he shouldn't have won it. My point is that voters are fickle and they'll vote for whatever flavor du jour is trendy at the time.
IMO, it doesn't mean chit. Just win baby!
Skip really going out on a limb not betting Pats outright vs. the field..Skip Bayless said Drake Maye is/will be great. But it's unlikely they win a SB this season. They need to know what it feels like to lose before winning. "Pay their dues" type thing. He acknowledged that the Patriots will likely be a SB caliber team sooner than later.
I never insinuated the Patriots need a loss. I asked if a loss would be good/bad in terms of the psychology aspect. It's something I thought alot about in general with sports.
I worded it poorly
The NFL today is not what it used to due to parity. If the playoffs started today, the only teams in the AFC with the most "experience" is Buffalo. Steelers with Rodgers. However, Buffalo's team is extremely weak and it's not going to matter come playoff time. Same with your Chiefs if they somehow find a way in. The 2005 Pats are a good example as they weren't as good as their 2004 team and ran into the Broncos who didn't really have much playoff experience with those players. The crazy thing is, had the Pats not intentionally dropped their week 17 game, they would've had the #3 seed and faced the Steelers who they probably beat. Indy is most likely facing Seattle in the Super Bowl.Skip Bayless said Drake Maye is/will be great. But it's unlikely they win a SB this season. They need to know what it feels like to lose before winning. "Pay their dues" type thing. He acknowledged that the Patriots will likely be a SB caliber team sooner than later.
If Brady was QB, he would pick them outright. Skip loves Brady lolSkip really going out on a limb not betting Pats outright vs. the field..
I don't see Indy running the table. Their opponents are too tough. They'll be lucky to get out with 4-2 against those opponents.If Indy runs the table against that schedule then they are the real deal and a Super Bowl favorite if they are healthy after that gauntlet.
Honestly, nothing yetWhy do they need to be humbled?? What have you seen from the players or coaches that warrants this theory of yours.
Like Brady needed to lose first before he could learn how to win?The NFL today is not what it used to due to parity. If the playoffs started today, the only teams in the AFC with the most "experience" is Buffalo. Steelers with Rodgers. However, Buffalo's team is extremely weak and it's not going to matter come playoff time. Same with your Chiefs if they somehow find a way in. The 2005 Pats are a good example as they weren't as good as their 2004 team and ran into the Broncos who didn't really have much playoff experience with those players. The crazy thing is, had the Pats not intentionally dropped their week 17 game, they would've had the #3 seed and faced the Steelers who they probably beat. Indy is most likely facing Seattle in the Super Bowl.
| 271 | 13K |
| 9 | 764 |
| 94 | 7K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
May 20 - June 4 (Through 26yrs)










