- Joined
- Feb 19, 2007
- Messages
- 28,220
- Reaction score
- 30,864
My problems with this explanation:
First it sends a terrible message to the lockeroom.
But more than that we need way more than depth out of those first rounders. If we passed up on Micah and all we get for our patience is some depth multiple years from now then that's not good.
They had a chance at a generational talent and instead chose to sit on the draft picks so the pressure is on to get something better with them and not just depth. I'll be pleasantly surprised if we do better than Micah.
I call BS This wasn't about picks. This was about money.
First it sends a terrible message to the lockeroom.
But more than that we need way more than depth out of those first rounders. If we passed up on Micah and all we get for our patience is some depth multiple years from now then that's not good.
They had a chance at a generational talent and instead chose to sit on the draft picks so the pressure is on to get something better with them and not just depth. I'll be pleasantly surprised if we do better than Micah.
I call BS This wasn't about picks. This was about money.












