And my point is I don't think any amount of time would have been respectful enough. If it was 5 years, you'd say say he deserved more than one year with Maye. If it was 6 years, it would be "he took the earliest QB's he could, it's not his fault they didn't pan out, you have to see what he can do with someone who can play".
There is zero evidence that there was a single player on the team that he didn't 100% approve and green light and you still hid behind "he should have never been forced to collaborate" as cover for his failure as a GM, despite his drafts being awful for years before that point.
Then there would be some point where he's in his mid to late 70's and we wasted years giving him every possible chance when he spent a career not doing that for any player he had. The guy was failing for a long time, showed no ability to turn the corner after being given years to do so, and he was at an age where every coach you could compare him to had either already been retired or was a year away from retiring.