- Joined
- Feb 19, 2007
- Messages
- 28,220
- Reaction score
- 30,864
Allegedly..
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Allegedly..
Allegedly..
This is a tricky draft. After Carter and Hunter there is probably like 10 players i would be happy getting at #4.Yeah, I’m cool with Jeanty as long as we can shore up the OL somehow. He’s an elite talent as a pure runner, pass protector & receiver.
I've been fairly well convinced it shouldn't be Tet but I still see WR as our second biggest need behind LT so I'm still sort of hoping Vrabel likes him. Plus I look more at production than draft season BS and forty times.
I'm settling on Campbell because LT is the biggest need and his production also speaks for itself but if they believe in the arm length stuff then I'm fine with any of the other top guys too.
Agree. Campbell is an elite LT prospect, IMO.My first preference at Tackle is Membou, but from everything I’m reading and hearing they are going to take Campbell, and I’m fine with that because he’s a really good left tackle prospect. My beliefs on Macmillan are well known.
****erson and Jurgens were both drafted in 2nd round, top 50 overall. Those could be considered premium picks.I think it's naive to look at it like that. Referring to the tweet and not you the poster.
Eagles Oline was made up of late rd Olinemen, 1 longtime vet RT taken in the top 10 but that was 10 years prior and a failed first rd pick OT converted to RG.
If the only glaring weakness was OT than taking either Campbell or Membou would be a no brainer.
But this team is deft of elite talent and you need elite talent to win in the NFL.
Name 1 team that won the superbowl and was consistently dependent without elite talent on both sides of the ball but had a solid oline.
The winless Browns had a good oline in the late 2000's with a HOF LT and multiple probowl olinemen to pair with him.
If there are about 10 players that Vrabel would be happy getting at 4 (and they are about equal), then a trade down is MORE likely to happen.This is a tricky draft. After Carter and Hunter there is probably like 10 players i would be happy getting at #4.
That's why I don't think a trade down will happen.
I’d be happy with Campbell (IF Hunter & Carter are gone at 4). I think he’s gonna be really good, and he’ll play with an extra chip on his shoulder. Also, I think Marrone will coach him up.Agree. Campbell is an elite LT prospect, IMO.
My point is that no one player stands out that would be worth trading up for.If there are about 10 players that Vrabel would be happy getting at 4 (and they are about equal), then a trade down is MORE likely to happen.
======================
For example, we might get one of Vrabel's top 6 available, the 9th pick and a 2nd rounder.
Or we might get one of Vrabel's top 3 available, the 6th pick and a 3rd rounder.
Or, of course, maybe no one wants any of the 10 enough to move up even a couple of spots.
Or, finally, maybe Vrabel really has one of the 10 above the rest on his board, that man being Campbell.
I agree that YOU or I don't know what player is worth a 2nd, or 3rd or 4th to trade up.My point is that no one player stands out that would be worth trading up for.
It takes a willing trade partner to make it happen. I just don't see any team in the 5-14 range wiling to part with extra picks when the talent level isn't that different
I’d be happy with Campbell (IF Hunter & Carter are gone at 4). I think he’s gonna be really good, and he’ll play with an extra chip on his shoulder. Also, I think Marrone will coach him up.
I want to start by saying I am a huge Campbell fan!!! The athleticism is off the charts. As a run blocker, he is a beast!!! The running backs will love him much more than anybody currently on the roster.I agree. This is a kid who is going to take to coaching and work his ass off to be great, and those are the kids you want on your roster. And the people ripping on him about arm length conveniently overlook the fact that he scored higher athletically than 99% of all tackles tested since 1987.
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 1 - April 16 (Through 26yrs)











