- Joined
- Sep 14, 2008
- Messages
- 7,592
- Reaction score
- 17,105
No4 for Pickens their First and their third.
It’s not just Pickens come on:
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.No4 for Pickens their First and their third.
It’s not just Pickens come on:
You realize the Steelers' first round pick is pick #21 right? So you want to go from #4 all the way down to #21 in exchange for Pickens?4 for Pickens their First and their third.
It’s not just Pickens come on:
A number 1 WR and taking a tackles like Simmons at 21 using the extra third to move backup for top player left on your board yes,You realize the Steelers' first round pick is pick #21 right? So you want to go from #4 all the way down to #21 in exchange for Pickens?
I just re-read @Zuma’s initial post. I clearly read it incorrectly and have no idea how I mixed that up.The poster Zuma is referencing is proposing trading 4 overall for Pickens.
I get theory here, that we can bring in several big needs but why Pickens?A number 1 WR and taking a tackles like Simmons at 21 using the extra third to move backup for top player left on your board yes,
This is if Hunter and Carter are off the Board at 4.
Hypothetically, what would you accept for that move down?You realize the Steelers' first round pick is pick #21 right? So you want to go from #4 all the way down to #21 in exchange for Pickens?
It's easy to do. People interchangably use "a 4th" and "a 4", which is then easy to mix up with just "4", meaning pick number 4.I just re-read @Zuma’s initial post. I clearly read it incorrectly and have no idea how I mixed that up.
It's easy to do. People interchangably use "a 4th" and "a 4", which is then easy to mix up with just "4", meaning pick number 4.
If the Steelers are trying to move up for Sanders, then yeah it'd need to be fairly significant. Your proposal isn't bad. I'd probably want another pick this year, like a 4th. They'd have to love the player to give up that much, yeah.Hypothetically, what would you accept for that move down?
I'd be tempted by something like
Pats get:
2025 21st overall
2025 R2
2026 R1
2026 R2
Steelers get:
2025 4th overall
2025 R5
Just don't see it from their angle unless they're in love with Shedeur.
Pickens is none of those guys. One HoFer who might be the best ever, one underappreciated RB, and a future HoFer safety.Randy Moss, Corey Dillon, Rodney Harrison say hi. The 4th pick would be lunacy...agree. I get that I'm in the minority....but I would for a 3rd rounder.
For which we can be thankful you do not have the keys to the car.My proposal was 4 for Pickens their first and a third.
I would be dancing in the street for that deal.
Pickens is a punk. Selfish. Won't block, making a "business decision". All set. I don't want hm anywhere near this roster. Why anyone thinks he's a good fit here (or anywhere) is beyond me. When you look up Why Bill Belichick Had A Mental Block When It Came To Drafting WRs, there's a picture of that idiot.'Vrabel the alpha', whose introductory press press conference included his stated goal of eliminating entitlement from his roster? That Vrabel is going to willingly import a known entitled and problematic man child?
He is great at those 50 50 balls makes amazing catches and I think he and Maye get to another stratosphere together.I get theory here, that we can bring in several big needs but why Pickens?
They were all punks until they were with us. They aren't all choir boys.Pickens is a punk.
That logic has gotten us the Thornton, Polks and Harry’s,They were all punks until they were with us. They aren't all choir boys.
1. This locker room doesn't have Tedy Bruschi, Lawyer Milloy, Ty Law, Richard Seymour, Willie McGinest to police itself.They were all punks until they were with us. They aren't all choir boys.
Somewhere between Bill Belichick eschewing knuckleheads and Pickens there's a middle ground. You want to put him on a the 2003-2004 team and let those guys mold him into a Patriot? Fine. Now? Absolutely not.That logic has gotten us the Thornton, Polks and Harry’s,
I guess I have much more faith in Vrabel laying the law down then you do. If you haven't noticed, he's pretty hard -nosed coach He's not going to be taking **** from anyone...not even AJ Brown types The days of the Krafty choir boys are over thank god. Time to start winning again.1. This locker room doesn't have Tedy Bruschi, Lawyer Milloy, Ty Law, Richard Seymour, Willie McGinest to police the locker room.
2. All three of those guys were joining a team with Super Bowl cache. This team is far from that.
3. Harrison was a hard ass that no one wanted to play with, the opposite of Pickens.
4. Moss was looking to prove he could do it still, and he was already a HoF player. Pickens has talent, but ain't no Randy Moss.
Somewhere between Bill Belichick eschewing knuckleheads and Pickens there's a middle ground. You want to put him on a the 2003-2004 team and let those guys mold him into a Patriot? Fine. Now? Absolutely not.
He's got issues for sure. I wonder if there is more to that then we know of.Why do the Steelers want to get rid of him?
We all know why?
He's a clubhouse problem that causes dissension in the team.
Antonio Brown #2
While I agree, this board was divided when Antonio Brown signed with the Pats and especially during his legal troubles.They were all punks until they were with us. They aren't all choir boys.
| 5 | 3K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
May 25 - June 9 (Through 26yrs)











