- Joined
- Sep 15, 2004
- Messages
- 35,852
- Reaction score
- 29,624
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.In an ideal situation he’d be perfectly good as the fourth guy on the depth chart. I’m not convinced he is anything more than that. He’s had some moments this year which is more than I anticipated as I wasn’t sure he’d even be on the roster.
On a team with an excellent RB, a good TE, and a very good WR1, you could win with Boutte as WR2.In an ideal situation he’d be perfectly good as the fourth guy on the depth chart. I’m not convinced he is anything more than that. He’s had some moments this year which is more than I anticipated as I wasn’t sure he’d even be on the roster.
Congrats to Boutte. For a long time, it didn't look like he would make the team, or that he would be the #6 WR.On a team with an excellent RB, a good TE, and a very good WR1, you could win with Boutte as WR2.
If we signed Higgins and drafted Hunter as a WR, we would be all set with Bourne healthy, Boutte, and Douglas.On a team with an excellent RB, a good TE, and a very good WR1, you could win with Boutte as WR2.
Boutte had pretty serious injury situation to play his way back from. In addition, he was sitting in bumper to bumper traffic waiting for the pile-up of failed vets/rookie WRs and unskilled QB to be cleared away so he could get a chance to play his way back. Circumstances are developing for him to finally show if he still has the potential hinted at in his pre-injury college career. I like the trend.Its only 1 great game vs a terrible Buffalo defense, but I will take what I can get.
7 targets - 5 receptions = 71% catch rate.
He doesn’t produce enough. He has basically been the 1 for most of this year and makes about 3 catches a game. Before this game his top yards in a game was 59 and second was 47. He is largely a liability that disappears for most of the game most weeks.On a team with an excellent RB, a good TE, and a very good WR1, you could win with Boutte as WR2.
Yes, we could draft Hunter and REQUIRE that he be a WR.If we signed Higgins and drafted Hunter as a WR, we would be all set with Bourne healthy, Boutte, and Douglas.
I think with WRs those guys have to have a certain mentality I remember Brady said that about his WRs one time.. it's a mentality they have to have even #4s like bouteeHe hasn't shown the ability to catch in traffic. He sort of backs away.
Boutte seems to be a decent blocker, however.
He also seems to have a big mouth for a #4.
I agree - Higgins is the X, Hunter is the Z, Boutte is the backup X, Bourne is the backup Z, Douglas is the slot.If we signed Higgins and drafted Hunter as a WR, we would be all set with Bourne healthy, Boutte, and Douglas.
Keep an eye out for kirk in Jacksonville.. hear they may be trying to get from under his contract.. he would be a Steve Smith type talent on the outside to play along with Higgins.. all of our current WRs are backups anyway.I agree - Higgins is the X, Hunter is the Z, Boutte is the backup X, Bourne is the backup Z, Douglas is the slot.
I would probably carry Baker as a development 6th/special teams guy. Dump Polk.
His contract was oversized at the time but he is a good player, I would take him. He would help Maye develop.Keep an eye out for kirk in Jacksonville.. hear they may be trying to get from under his contract.. he would be a Steve Smith type talent on the outside to play along with Higgins.. all of our current WRs are backups anyway.
Yes! Kirk would be perfect on the outside.. guys tough, has sure hands.. also he can go across the middle and he can separate... there will be also of angles the team can take to get Drake some guys.. trading for DJ. Moore in Chicago is another option.. Higgins is the obvious one and we will likely have to over pay for him.. there alot of guys that have taken notice of Drake! Mac on his best day couldn't make that beautiful 3rd and 8 TD to Boutte.His contract was oversized at the time but he is a good player, I would take him. He would help Maye develop.
His contract was oversized at the time but he is a good player, I would take him. He would help Maye develop.
We will likely have a revamped WR Corps next season. Names we should be in on.. DJ Moore, Higgins*, kirk, if we were to get say Higgins and sign kirk once released. Boutte is likely a 3 or 4.. wicj is great for him.. he'll be able to feast on 3rd and 4th CBs.I think Boutte can be a solid to number 2 outside receiver. Next year is key, will he take a jump? I consider this year his real rookie year and year 2 jump is a real thing.
-He’s been covered by the best CB on the other team most games, yet still produces some plays.
-He’s 22 years old
-He’s had a small amount of time to work with Maye
Yes we would be much better with two $15M to $25M AAV wide receivers.We will likely have a revamped WR Corps next season. Names we should be in on.. DJ Moore, Higgins*, kirk, if we were to get say Higgins and sign kirk once released. Boutte is likely a 3 or 4.. wicj is great for him.. he'll be able to feast on 3rd and 4th CBs.
Agreed. Is why we need at minimum 2 game changers on the outside at WR next season. To become a good efficient offense we need to threaten every part of the field.. Gibson is our do it all back.. I think he will have a bigger role next season like how Buffalo uses cook. That will be able to be possible because of the threats from Higgins and or Kirk/DJ Moore.Boutte's had some moments. He beat Stingley & Gardner deep. He's only 22 years old & is being asked to be the #1 WR. He's honestly a great backup X WR to Tee Higgins who's performed like a #1 WR but misses a few games a season.
X Higgins
Z Hunter
slot Douglas
WR4 Boutte
| 27 | 1K |
| 49 | 5K |
| 212 | 14K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











