There’s not much point in continuing this, but I’ll give it one more shot. I said all “all things being equal” and then gave the example of giving Jerry Rice more speed: exact same player, but 4.4 speed. It’s a thought experiment designed to prove a point: more speed is better, all other things being equal. Of course two completely different players cannot be rank ordered on a single attribute (edit: unless an attribute is so extreme it is exclusionary, like a 5.2s 40 time -- I don't think there's a wide receiver in the league with a 40 that slow). I never said that, it’s a straw man, it’s silly, and unfair to me. I’ve been very clear on this across multiple posts, and I’m just misrepresented, over and over. It’s really getting frustrating.
So, either I am failing to communicate these ideas, you all are failing to understand my argument, or you’d rather argue with a straw man than with me. I’m fine with folks disagreeing with the argument I am making, but folks are disagreeing with an argument I haven’t made. So I give up.
It’s 23 inches faster (0.07s) at 40 yds. It might be the difference between running under that ball to win the big game, or not. 0.01s (3.25 in) or perhaps even 0.02s (6.5 in) are arguably negligible (especially with natural variance in times). I know this may not be convincing, but in my mind there are game scenarios where that little extra juice would make a difference. There’s probably a statistical way to analyze this, but that’s beyond me.
And again, this isn’t about making rank order decisions on completely different players based on a single attribute. All the tangibles and intangibles need to be considered.