PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Its early but Patriots will regret not taking Ladd Mcconkey

Status
Not open for further replies.
Polk’s RAS Score blew away McConkey’s. And if you are looking for a comparable WR physically and athletically then imo it’s Hines Ward 6’0 205 4.55. Polk goes 6’1 203 4,52.

4,52 40 isn’t a “ deficiency,” hundreds, if not thousands of WR’s have been successful in the NFLwith similar speed. If he ran a 4.7 then it would be a deficiency, Jerry Rice ran a 4.58. Tyquan Thornton ran a 4.21. I’m having a difficult time deciding who the better receiver is/ was.

On the positive side for Tyquan, in looking up his 40 time I als found out that he’s still only 23, which is a decent reason to give him one more shot, as that’s an age many players enter the league at. On the other hand it’s tough to keep a 5th it 6th receiver that’d doesn’t play St’s.
Yeah I’ve truly struggled to understand why people have lamented a 4.52 forty so much. His teammate drafted in the top 10 Rome Odunze ran 0.07 faster and no one seems to have an issue with him.
 
Polk’s RAS Score blew away McConkey’s. And if you are looking for a comparable WR physically and athletically then imo it’s Hines Ward 6’0 205 4.55. Polk goes 6’1 203 4,52.
McConkey’s score is 9.32. Polk is the one who got blown away by that metric. And his RAS score is less reliable because he skipped agility drills.

4,52 40 isn’t a “ deficiency,” hundreds, if not thousands of WR’s have been successful in the NFLwith similar speed. If he ran a 4.7 then it would be a deficiency, Jerry Rice ran a 4.58. Tyquan Thornton ran a 4.21. I’m having a difficult time deciding who the better receiver is/ was.
It’s a deficiency in the sense that it’s below average, slightly. All things being equal, you’d prefer to have a faster receiver, right? But as I’ve said a dozen times in this thread, measurables don’t tell the whole story, especially when considering one in isolation. Still, speed matters. How much better would Rice have been if he could run 4.4, all things being equal? But, you can have all the physical talent in the world and wash out of the NFL, because you have no drive, work ethic, etc. The point is that it ALL matters when drafting. Subpar athleticism can sink you, a bad work ethic can too.

My biggest issue with Polk isn’t the pedestrian 40, it’s that he skipped agility drills. There are only two reasons to do so: 1. Injury, and 2. Strategy. I assume his agent recommended that he not run them because the results would put some teams off. Afaik, he wasn’t injured.

But, it’s all good. The Pats drafted him, so they think the total package is a good one. It sounds like his intangibles are well regarded. We will see.

On the positive side for Tyquan, in looking up his 40 time I als found out that he’s still only 23, which is a decent reason to give him one more shot, as that’s an age many players enter the league at. On the other hand it’s tough to keep a 5th it 6th receiver that’d doesn’t play St’s.
He should definitely get more bites at the apple, given the circumstances.
 
Yeah I’ve truly struggled to understand why people have lamented a 4.52 forty so much. His teammate drafted in the top 10 Rome Odunze ran 0.07 faster and no one seems to have an issue with him.
0.07s gives a 2 foot gap over that distance. It’s not insignificant. And unlike Polk, Odunze ran the agility drills and crushed them, yielding a RAS score of 9.92 vs 9.11. These two aren’t even in the same solar system athletically.
 
This thread is why I hate the June/July offseason. What we need is for Jerod Mayo to get caught cheating by filming another team's practice with his iPhone, or deflating footballs, or fooling around with a 24-year-old on his yacht off Nantucket.

But I did note that Ladd McConkey has been invited to Canton, Ohio for a fitting of his yellow jacket for the Hall of Fame. His seven 100ths of a second superiority in the 40-yard-dash was all they needed to know that he is a can't miss slot receiver.

See ya later, guys. I think I'll go back to the comments on goalie Linus Ullmark and how awful the Bruins are in making trades. At least over there, there's something worth leaping off the top floor of the Prudential Tower.
 

Attachments

  • man-jumping-out-window-scene-eb87hk4btx0nks4q.gif
    man-jumping-out-window-scene-eb87hk4btx0nks4q.gif
    10.4 MB · Views: 1
Last edited:
0.07s gives a 2 foot gap over that distance. It’s not insignificant. And unlike Polk, Odunze ran the agility drills and crushed them, yielding a RAS score of 9.92 vs 9.11. These two aren’t even in the same solar system athletically.
It shows that Polk works well with others get a Aiyuk and Polk would torch the Defense with Aiyuk drawing the tougher matchups. Rome Odunze was the man at Washington but the afterthought Polk made the Defense pay.
 
No doubt the dude is a high level jitterbug but he would already be competing with Pop for the slot. Polk/Baker are better fits for what the Pats need. Also, the dude is 180, not that strong, and missed time with minor injuries...so he will need to hit the weight room to ensure that he stays on the field.

In a vacuum, it looks like a missed opportunity for the Pats but when taking into the Pop/Polk/Baker combo vs Ladd/Pop both crossing the middle, Pats did well.
 
Gronkowski was a "Gronk". No comparison or mold for what he did. Seriously, he was one of those players who was a man among boys.
He really was.

If players had to play him straight up instead of going at his knees because they couldn’t match him one on one, he might still be playing.

He had the most physical ability of any TE I can think of.

Gronk was truly a man among boys.
 
Last edited:
See ya later, guys. I think I'll go back to the comments on goalie Linus Ullmark and how awful the Bruins are in making trades. At least over there, there's something worth leaping off the top floor of the Prudential Tower.
I wonder what that jumper’s 40 time was. We already know he has a good vertical
 
never heard the dude talked about here before this thread
Yeah the college football threads don’t get much traction here through the season but obviously the theme/focus here is Pats/NFL so guess it’s understood. Most takes naturally come once the draft approaches and people first learn of these players by draft boards, 30 second clips and second hand takes. That said, doesn’t minimize the number of, “they should have drafted player x instead of y”.
 
0.07s gives a 2 foot gap over that distance. It’s not insignificant. And unlike Polk, Odunze ran the agility drills and crushed them, yielding a RAS score of 9.92 vs 9.11. These two aren’t even in the same solar system athletically.
So guys who ran a fifth of a second faster than Odunze must be much better than him, and guys who ran a fifth of a second better than that must be an ever higher level, etc? How much better must Thornton be than Odunze considering he ran a full 0.27 faster?

I really cannot be convinced that roughly a fifth of a second faster running 40 yards in a straight line against air with no pads on makes any difference.

Edit: sorry… not sure why I said a fifth… that would have been 0.20. We are talking about seven hundredths of a second
 
Last edited:
So guys who ran a fifth of a second faster than Odunze must be much better than him, and guys who ran a fifth of a second better than that must be an ever higher level, etc? How much better must Thornton be than Odunze considering he ran a full 0.27 faster?
There’s not much point in continuing this, but I’ll give it one more shot. I said all “all things being equal” and then gave the example of giving Jerry Rice more speed: exact same player, but 4.4 speed. It’s a thought experiment designed to prove a point: more speed is better, all other things being equal. Of course two completely different players cannot be rank ordered on a single attribute (edit: unless an attribute is so extreme it is exclusionary, like a 5.2s 40 time -- I don't think there's a wide receiver in the league with a 40 that slow). I never said that, it’s a straw man, it’s silly, and unfair to me. I’ve been very clear on this across multiple posts, and I’m just misrepresented, over and over. It’s really getting frustrating.

So, either I am failing to communicate these ideas, you all are failing to understand my argument, or you’d rather argue with a straw man than with me. I’m fine with folks disagreeing with the argument I am making, but folks are disagreeing with an argument I haven’t made. So I give up.

I really cannot be convinced that roughly a fifth of a second faster running 40 yards in a straight line against air with no pads on makes any difference.
It’s 23 inches faster (0.07s) at 40 yds. It might be the difference between running under that ball to win the big game, or not. 0.01s (3.25 in) or perhaps even 0.02s (6.5 in) are arguably negligible (especially with natural variance in times). I know this may not be convincing, but in my mind there are game scenarios where that little extra juice would make a difference. There’s probably a statistical way to analyze this, but that’s beyond me.

And again, this isn’t about making rank order decisions on completely different players based on a single attribute. All the tangibles and intangibles need to be considered.
 
Last edited:
0.07s gives a 2 foot gap over that distance. It’s not insignificant. And unlike Polk, Odunze ran the agility drills and crushed them, yielding a RAS score of 9.92 vs 9.11. These two aren’t even in the same solar system athletically.
A 2 foot difference in a 40 yard run is actually pretty insignificant.
 
There’s not much point in continuing this, but I’ll give it one more shot. I said all “all things being equal” and then gave the example of giving Jerry Rice more speed: exact same player, but 4.4 speed. It’s a thought experiment designed to prove a point: more speed is better, all other things being equal. Of course two completely different players cannot be rank ordered on a single attribute (edit: unless an attribute is so extreme it is exclusionary, like a 5.2s 40 time -- I don't think there's a wide receiver in the league with a 40 that slow). I never said that, it’s a straw man, it’s silly, and unfair to me. I’ve been very clear on this across multiple posts, and I’m just misrepresented, over and over. It’s really getting frustrating.

So, either I am failing to communicate these ideas, you all are failing to understand my argument, or you’d rather argue with a straw man than with me. I’m fine with folks disagreeing with the argument I am making, but folks are disagreeing with an argument I haven’t made. So I give up.


It’s 23 inches faster (0.07s) at 40 yds. It might be the difference between running under that ball to win the big game, or not. 0.01s (3.25 in) or perhaps even 0.02s (6.5 in) are arguably negligible (especially with natural variance in times). I know this may not be convincing, but in my mind there are game scenarios where that little extra juice would make a difference. There’s probably a statistical way to analyze this, but that’s beyond me.

And again, this isn’t about making rank order decisions on completely different players based on a single attribute. All the tangibles and intangibles need to be considered.
Don't mean to interrupt but if you don't see upside in those stats I don't know what to tell you. Many Draft publications and Guru's touted Polk. I see diamond in the rough when it's all said and done.

 
Don't mean to interrupt but if you don't see upside in those stats I don't know what to tell you. Many Draft publications and Guru's touted Polk. I see diamond in the rough when it's all said and done.

Steve Smith Sr had a lot of good things to say about Polk.
 
Don't mean to interrupt but if you don't see upside in those stats I don't know what to tell you. Many Draft publications and Guru's touted Polk. I see diamond in the rough when it's all said and done.

Upside in which stats, specifically? The three cone and shuttle stats which don’t exist? The upside in his below average 40?

You mean his production in college? Yes, he had good numbers in his final season, but there have been countless times when productive college players have washed out of the NFL. A recent example, right here at home: N’Keal Harrry. Harry has far more impressive college stats, and was a total failure.

If Polk succeeds and has a good career, it will be because of the intangibles: football IQ, drive, competitiveness, work ethic, etc. Harry was deficient, but reports are that Polk has good intangibles.
 
A 2 foot difference in a 40 yard run is actually pretty insignificant.
I disagree. Football is a game of inches. I already gave a plausible, in game scenario where it would make a difference.

But I’ll bite: how many feet is significant? 4 feet? 8 feet? Give me a number and I’ll compute the difference in 40 time (using 4.45 as the base).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Former Patriots Super Bowl MVP Set to Announce Pick During Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel’s Media Statement on Tuesday 4/21
MORSE: What Will the Patriots Do in the Draft?
MORSE: Patriots Prospects and 30 Visits
Patriots News 04-19, Countdown To Draft Day
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 6 – A Week Before the Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
MORSE: Pre-Draft Patriots News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
Mark Morse
2 weeks ago
Back
Top