scott99
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2014
- Messages
- 8,320
- Reaction score
- 8,985
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
Isn’t that why Brissett is here? Nobody is expecting a rookie QB to come in and be the savior right away, so take the QB and start the build around him, properly this time.Too many glaring roster holes to put it on the shoulders of a rookie quarterback "savior" who can't be a difference maker anytime soon, regardless. Build the offensive infrastructure first, plug in the QB later. So, no.
But of course, this team hasn't done much of anything I've wanted it to do post-BB so why start now?
Yep. This is what it comes down to, you definitely take the quarterback if you think he's the guy. It's a weird thing that people spend their lives analyzing quarterbacks and nobody seems to know who will work out, I don't really get it. I'm not really a big college football guy but I feel like if I spent my life watching it I would know. But yeah, you won't win without a quarterback so if he's there take him. Not really that complicated at the end of the day.I think we should take a QB only if the one we want is available... I've come to the conclusion that we should not draft the guy we don't want
I think it’s a given that they only take them if they have a grade on them that makes them worth the pick, I don’t believe they will take them if they don’t. Option 2 for me is trading out the pick , 3 1st round picks is worth far more than either Harrison or Alt are worth. I would only stay at 3 if the offers for the pick sucked, as I don’t believe either Alt or Harrison are the “ generational talents” some are claiming them to be. I think you can get OT’s and WR’s like them with a high pick in every draft, and I actually like Nabers more than Harrison because he’s better after the catch.maybe i'm overthinking this... I think we should take a QB only if the one we want is available... I've come to the conclusion that we should not draft the guy we don't want... If the new offense has a plan/scheme they want to implement, and the third QB option does not adequately fill that role, there is no reason the reach... tbh, I am not sold on any of the QB prospects, so maybe that is clouding my judgement...
If that is the case, the three options remaining are
▪ Draft the best LT in the draft
▪ Draft the BPA (Harrison jr?)
▪ Trade #3
The question is though, what will you get for #3? Is it worth it to pass over what could very well be two foundational pieces in LT Alt or WR Harrison, who could be here for years to come...