- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 33,450
- Reaction score
- 19,222
I disagree on these two. As I've said before, he can't have final say over the roster. If he's unwilling to accept that, then, yes, there needs to be a "conscious uncoupling."7. Bill must go, period. I'd love to see it happen harmoniously, in a way which benefits the team but takes Bill's feelings and the debt we owe him into account - but it must happen. It's over.
8. Yep. Doesn't matter though. If Bill has declined to the point he is not able to fill his role, as I believe he has, he has to go, whatever the subsequent challenges might be. We must be realistic: it will take at least two years to get this utterly failed team back into any sort of order. So it goes. Buckle up. There will be headwinds and weird twisteroos. Could be fun.
I also don't think it's guaranteed to take that long to get this team back on the right track. This team is where it is in large part because of the confluence of [not adequately addressing the RT situation] + {brutal luck on injuries] + [having to play Vederian Lowe].
This offseason, they'll have a top pick and the most cap room over the next three years to work with. If they commit to doing a better job on acquiring offensive talent, they can be competitive next year. Hell, even with all the problems, they've still been competitive in most of their games this season.












