- Joined
- Aug 22, 2005
- Messages
- 35,784
- Reaction score
- 27,860
I like good job.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I like good job.
Interesting. So that's good company. If he can put it together and keep it together mentally
The track record of drafting WRs is largely not drafting them or not drafting them early.
The result of that strategy is the winningest 23 year run in the history of the sport.
Perhaps rather than whining about WRs that would lead you to understand that drafting WRs isn’t as important as you think.
But that’s just me, I see success, I say whatever happened worked. You see success and you find the flaw that was overcome and act as if it was a horrendous curse.
So you think they won because they never drafted receivers?
Or did they win because they had Tom Brady? Maybe one of those is more important than the other in your analysis
All the teams around the league with top receivers would disagree.
In any discussion of receivers and patriots success without a "top one" needs to keep into account that gronk was basically a receiver. Just as Kelce is for KC
I hear you Andy but if you look at it objectively, we have been poor at drafting the position. I like old school football so ground and pound is fine by me. However, the league has changed and Goddell has made the rules where the offence is now favoured. The game has changed significantly in the last decade. It's true that we have not invested much in the position, in terms of draft capital, but that which we have, has not worked out. It is a clear weakness of the GM and of that there can be no doubt.I am saying what they did was the most successful run in history.
Every team makes some good decisions and some bad. Every team is good at some things and bad at others. The draft is one small piece of building a team. The drafting of WRs is a small piece of that small piece.
All the teams with “top receivers” who never won a SB can’t say much to the teams without “top receivers” who win SBs, can they? Other than they were more exciting while not wining and, oh boy, the fantasy football points.
We signed the Super Bowl winning team's #1 WR so we are all set.So you think they won because they never drafted receivers?
Or did they win because they had Tom Brady? Maybe one of those is more important than the other in your analysis
All the teams around the league with top receivers would disagree.
In any discussion of receivers and patriots success without a "top one" needs to keep into account that gronk was basically a receiver. Just as Kelce is for KC
Where he was drafted should have nothing to do with it. That's a sunk cost and shouldn't factor in it.I’m pretty sure Thornton won’t get cut or traded this year because of where he was drafted…we’ll see if he gets IR’d. He’s got to show something this season though, otherwise he’ll be on the hot seat come next training camp
We signed the Super Bowl winning team's #1 WR so we are all set.
Where he was drafted should have nothing to do with it. That's a sunk cost and shouldn't factor in it.
I think he is destined for a case of the Foxboro Flu.Tyquan isn't going anywhere, other than maybe to IR. I hope he's practicing this week.
It factors in when he’s in his 2nd year. 2nd round picks don’t get cut in year 2 unless there’s extracurricular stuff involved.Where he was drafted should have nothing to do with it. That's a sunk cost and shouldn't factor in it.
I am saying what they did was the most successful run in history.
Every team makes some good decisions and some bad. Every team is good at some things and bad at others. The draft is one small piece of building a team. The drafting of WRs is a small piece of that small piece.
All the teams with “top receivers” who never won a SB can’t say much to the teams without “top receivers” who win SBs, can they? Other than they were more exciting while not wining and, oh boy, the fantasy football points.
We have chosen, very successfully, to do it differently.I hear you Andy but if you look at it objectively, we have been poor at drafting the position. I like old school football so ground and pound is fine by me. However, the league has changed and Goddell has made the rules where the offence is now favoured. The game has changed significantly in the last decade. It's true that we have not invested much in the position, in terms of draft capital, but that which we have, has not worked out. It is a clear weakness of the GM and of that there can be no doubt.
Every team has strengths and weaknesses. Whatever impact you want to think drafting WRs has had, the end result is the most success ever.Its a pure myth that we have won without "top receivers" and that they are just about exciting and fantasy football points.
Why do we always ignore that Brady had Rob gronkowski one of the greatest mismatches of all time? Not even counting Edelman who was able to get open at will.
When I say receivers I mean "receiving talent". I just think it's been a weak spot for bill. It's a reason we have had to overpay for vets.
Now maybe Douglas/Boutte change that. We will see
Todd PinkstonAgain I will say that the comp for Thornton is Will Fuller, not a route runner like Smith.
| 156 | 17K |
| 34 | 3K |
| 3K | 183K |
| 69 | 9K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 10 - April 25 (Through 26yrs)










