- Joined
- Jul 1, 2007
- Messages
- 16,481
- Reaction score
- 27,728
Never.Comments:
a.) Parcells should be in the Patriots HOF. But that is an argument for another day.
If he gets in, Pete Carroll should get in, he had a better record.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Never.Comments:
a.) Parcells should be in the Patriots HOF. But that is an argument for another day.
I doubt the bolded part. Kraft hired him because he felt he was ready to be a HC in 2000. What Bill did during the 1999 season got him a lot attention slowing down both Drew Bledsoe and Peyton Manning.Parcells introduced BB to Kraft. Don’t let anyone kid you. I was there, I saw it. Kraft hired BB to spite Parcells. If there is no Parcells, there is no BB. If there is no Parcella, there is no dynasty.
Yes, but at the end of the day, Bob made the choice to take a chance on Bill.I’m not taking anything away from BB & TB12, the drivers of the dynasty, but neither of those guys ever step foot in New England, if it were for Parcells, the man that started it all.
That and the 1996 draft.Incredible drafting that completely turned the franchise around. Drafted two Hall of Damers in 1995. Maybe the greatest draft in league history.
He was not a foundational piece. Richard Seymour was a foundational piece. That 2001 defense would've been pretty bad without him. Ted Washington in 2003 was a foundational piece as they don't run the 3-4 without him. Ditto with Wilfork.This board is severely underselling Vrabel. Absolute foundational piece of that great defense, versatile, clutch when the team needed him.
Vrabel just happened to be on winning teams and a part of good defenses, but he was not the reason they were that good in 2003 and 2004.Mankins and Welker were more accomplished players and greater talents, Vrabel contributed more to the lore of the dynasty.
The team was prepared. Coaching was a major reason why that team got as far as they did. Green Bay was the better team. Our ****ing quarterback had 4 INTs. Their quarterback had 0 turnovers. That's why we lost the game. Not because Parcells was doing his own thing in with his free time.There's a very solid argument for Parcells not getting into the team HOF: The week before the Super Bowl, his priority was getting another job, not preparing the team.
He was the only choice of the 3 finalists.
I wish Kraft would take a break from getting his pipe polished and put Julius Adams in by executive order.
To be fair, the fact Max Lane was 1 on 1 with Reggie White had something to do with that. That's a coaching failure. As was going away from Curtis Martin who was gashing them in the 3rd quarter to inexplicably let Bledsoe sling it with a compromised OL - see first sentence. As was kicking to Desmond Howard again after he almost did early in the game what we all know he did later.The team was prepared. Coaching was a major reason why that team got as far as they did. Green Bay was the better team. Our ****ing quarterback had 4 INTs. Their quarterback had 0 turnovers. That's why we lost the game. Not because Parcells was doing his own thing in with his free time.
Parcells set the table for Dynasty 1.0. He brought in the pieces on defense that made that happen (BB added a few more to finish the job). It's what Tuna does best... build up teams from nothing and I bet the Jets were attractive to him for that reason. When Parcells arrived IIRC the Patriots were on the verge of leaving NE.
But it's hard to look past Parcells literally bailing on the team during Super Bowl week. He was outcoached in the game big time by Holmgren. He also went scorched earth on his old team after he left including stealing Curtis Martin.
Parcells?? I would love for someone to tell me why hasn't this man been elected yet. He basically got the ball rolling from what the patriots were to what they are as many know them to be today.
This is the part that patriots fans need to get over. As you said, Parcells set the table for the Dynasty. That is it, end of subject. Can't penalize him for however the SB played out. Plus he got them there. We should not just judge him on that, plus he still was a hell of a coach while he was here. He played a big part of what the patriots are today. Same as Bledsoe. No he wasn't as good Brady obviously and i am sure if we were to compare him to other QBs he doesn't measure up, but it's what he did for the franchise that should hold him in high regards. Same should be said for him.
Just shameful patriots fans have not voted him in yet.
How?his influence on the dynasty was vastly overrated
All fair second guessing of the coaching. But the quarterback still sucked bigtime. And there's no way to draw a line from Parcells talking to Jets pre-SB to the coaching decisions and player execution during the game. That's my main point.To be fair, the fact Max Lane was 1 on 1 with Reggie White had something to do with that. That's a coaching failure. As was going away from Curtis Martin who was gashing them in the 3rd quarter to inexplicably let Bledsoe sling it with a compromised OL - see first sentence. As was kicking to Desmond Howard again after he almost did early in the game what we all know he did later.
I like Parcells, and I think he's deserving of induction to the Patriots HOF, but 100%, Wes Welker should have been the inductee for 2023.
Great question. Maybe someone else can answer it. I have no clue. What asinine franchise HOF doesn't induct their best all time WR?why isnt he in yet?
Wes has been eligible and nominated.Or maybe its not his time yet?
his influence on the dynasty was vastly overrated
How?
A lot of those players that helped win the 01 SB was players Parcell's drafted and coached as well.
@Dingeberry..ha ha that man did not sabotage the SB. On top of the fact he got you there in the in the first place. (granted if i was to nitpick, Denver had no business losing to the upstart jags making it easier for us to get there in the first place)
How?
A lot of those players that helped win the 01 SB was players Parcell's drafted and coached as well.
@Dingeberry..ha ha that man did not sabotage the SB. On top of the fact he got you there in the in the first place. (granted if i was to nitpick, Denver had no business losing to the upstart jags making it easier for us to get there in the first place)
parcells as a coach is overrated; he had his most success when he had great assistants....beyond that, he was pretty fear based and players, especially vets, tended to tune him out (no pun intended)....it's a big reason his career was dotted with short stints post giants; he was a great GM, overrated as a coach
the pats had two good drafts before he got here, and then grier took over in 96, and they continued to have great drafts.......i'd argue parcells had very little to do with player development once they were drafted, but that's me
but you lose all credibility when you say he did not sabotage the SB.......that's straight fact
Bob Kraft will always be the savior for this franchise.......Parcells was just a cog in the wheel......good GM, brought in some good players, .500 as a coach, threw a temper tantrum, quit on his franchise, acted like a petulant brat, held his breath and ran......screw him
The truth is that Kraft deferred to Belichick when all he had to do was exercise some common sense and do for Tom what he did for Drew, who then stunk and they got rid of him anyway.Sorry bud, but a lot of people find it worth discussing. You don't have to participate. Do I go out of my way to tell you what you can and cannot find interesting? And I don't ever recall telling you that you can't speak.
But to answer your question, in part, the split, and Brady's subsequent success in Tampa Bay really charged up the debate. I think Bill's of the belief that "his system" is mostly responsible for the team's success and it motivated him some to move on from Brady (to create an opportunity to prove it). It completely backfired because Brady won and he hasn't. I also think Brady felt disrespected by Bill because he wouldn't commit to him beyond one year at a time. Brady got the commitment from another team and he wanted to validate their decision so he merely led them to a Super Bowl championship. Not bad for a 43-year-old quarterback.
| 112 | 5K |
| 56 | 2K |
| 23 | 901 |
| 19 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 10 - April 25 (Through 26yrs)










