respect as always
@patfanken but that is a hardly an argument. if your need is a tackle what good is the argument that they found guards and centers in later rounds?
Of some 15 OTs drafted by BB (and Dante) in later rounds (3-7) they were able to find ONE starter - and he was a RT (Cannon). In 22 years!
The bigger problem is i dont see even ONE elite prospect tackle in this Draft esp @ LT.
You can MAYBE find a decent starter yr 1 esp @ RT - but is the investment of #14 worth it? Esp. since there doesnt seem to be significant difference overall among top 5-10 tackle prospects.
At least at LT it seems like the Kolton Miller 2.0 - paying a premium both in the Draft and later huge extension for an average OT that will not take you anywhere.
_____________
Thats why punting on consecutive great OT classes by BB lately - esp being such a rarity + severe lack in NFL - is just baffling to me.
The way regression of the line is killing NE prime asset (#15 QB on a rookie deal) & maybe even more importantly clouding the evaluation process - serious investment @ LT would be sensible and that option doesnt look to be 2023 Draft nor betting on Mount Brown.
So atm id say draft starting potential RT and pay whatever necessary for LT (probably via trade).
Hitting on those two makes everyone else on the team better (incl defense by complementary football extension) so that would always be my priority..