All3Phases
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2022
- Messages
- 1,413
- Reaction score
- 662
AgreeThe saying has always been "You get paid for what you're going to do. Not what you've done."
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.AgreeThe saying has always been "You get paid for what you're going to do. Not what you've done."
Bill bungled too many drafts. That is why they ended up where they did in 2019.2017: Cooks, Gronk, Brady, Solder, Gilmore, McCourty, Hightower
2018: Gronk, Brady, Gilmore, McCourty, Hightower, Mason, Cannon, Chung, Thuney
This is why the team maxed out in 2019.
Which ones? It sure wasn't 2011-2018Bill bungled too many drafts. That is why they ended up where they did in 2019.
Putting him on a pedestal just because you are insecure and in the process put Bill down is a different matter...
Disagree that he's a once in a lifetime player.
there are plenty of coaches brady could have won withThere are plenty of elite QBs who could have won with Bill.
Sorry, Im confused mostly about this portion...How did they break their cap formula to contend in 2018? Which monster deals did they sign during that period that hindered them in 2020? The drafting is why the roster was thin, coming into the 2020s
That goes for players under a salary cap. There is no salary cap for coaches. If you don't like Belichick, fire him. Otherwise you'll have to give an example of coaches taking less rather than being fired.The saying has always been "You get paid for what you're going to do. Not what you've done."
Contracts have these things called signing bonuses and they are pushed to the future.2017---So because these players were under contract, they maxed out? Cooks btw was on his rookie deal, Solder on the last year of his deal...Brady again at a bargain
2018--Again, these players caused the patriots to run out of money? Even though they extended Chung and franchised Thuney and let Brady walk in 2020?
Show me one example where coaches have negotiated pay cutsAgree
He bungled so many drafts that he had too many stars on the team!Bill bungled too many drafts. That is why they ended up where they did in 2019.
LOL, exactly, if the players sucked, we wouldn't have had a salary jam-up.If your previous contentions that the cap is 'easily manageable' were true, bad drafts wouldn't matter. We also wouldn't be having this conversation.
This doesn’t explain how these specific contracts put the team in cap hellContracts have these things called signing bonuses and they are pushed to the future.
This was because their talent pool was depleted via lack of drafting…they bolstered the middle and back of their roster with free agents, but that again doesn’t explain why the roster was poor in 2020 because of their management in 2017/18. The drafts however does explain a lot of itYou seem confused about several things as regards my points about the cap. FA monster deals aren't the way the Pats changed how they did business. They'd brought in expensive players when needed in the past, Colvin, Revis, Gilmore come to mind. What changed was they paid too many of their own guys to age in place,
Honestly, none of this is reflecting why the 2017/18 management hindered the future rosterswith guys being jettisoned too late because of their contract situations rather thanned, too early from a cap standpoint. And yes, bad drafts played into it but if 'the cap is crap' then bad drafts would not matter. I freely confess I'm a neophyte when it comes to the vagaries of the cap but at least I'm up front about the realities of its existence. In the Robinson thread I tried pointing out that Chung's contract extension was signed before the 2019 season as a rework to create cap room and was exempt for 2020 because of COVID . If they weren't so close to championships do you really believe Hightower wouldn't have been moved? Or that Thuney would have gotten to a tag year in 2019? That the two of them would not have gone the way of Seymour or Logan Mankins? Do you think New England would have paid Gilmore to come here in '17 if they didn't see him as a potential missing piece?
And they used the money that would’ve easily fit Brady onto the roster to sign players that had no future here, outside of McCourty, who still is not really needed. You can easily plop Brady on the roster and take off one or two of the horrendous contracts they signed and still rebuild the exact way they did…the depletion of the roster is because of the poor drafting where they missed a ton for a periodIf your previous contentions that the cap is 'easily manageable' were true, bad drafts wouldn't matter. We also wouldn't be having this conversation. The Pats would simply have sprinkled their magic cap management dust on everything and presto! Brady would still be here, surrounded by talent. Tagging Thuney and signing McCourty aren't proof the Pats had cap space to play with, they were only able to sign them because the cap wasn't used up in a Brady signing.
And it would’ve continued and there would’ve been 0 mention of a rebuild had he signed in 2020. They chose to feed you excusesChung's signing was an extension for cap relief before the 2019 season. The truth is personnel / contract decisions don't happen in a vacuum, every one of them impacts the whole. The Pats contended for as long as they did because they had the greatest QB of all time,
A vast majority of their stars were from previous periods in the draft or FA. If you turn a blind eye to the lack of production from the drafts from 2014-2020, then there is no helping youHe bungled so many drafts that he had too many stars on the team!
The genius of some of you.
Amazes me too coming off a Super Bowl victory that every other fanbase would give an arm and a leg for.
A section of Patriot fandom has CTE from too many Super Trophy hits to the head.
Irrelevant to the fact we had a huge amount of money bundled up in stars (which is, after all, the point of this discussion). However they got here, they were here. They helped win Super Bowls.A vast majority of their stars were from previous periods in the draft or FA. If you turn a blind eye to the lack of production from the drafts from 2014-2020, then there is no helping you
The point is, show me the contracts of those few players you mentioned and the effect they had, money wise, on the team in 2020…if signing 2 big contracts hindered them, then they would’ve been hindered every year for 2 decades, as well as every other team on earthIrrelevant to the fact we had a huge amount of money bundled up in stars (which is, after all, the point of this discussion). However they got here, they were here. They helped win Super Bowls.
That's the whole point of what we're talking about
It does, because you're not only paying contracts, you're also paying dead money. I listed all the high contracts in my previous post. It's more than the ones you listed.This doesn’t explain how these specific contracts put the team in cap hell
So you’re including 2019 into the conversation about 2017/2018? You also listed Mccourty 3 times. You’re acting like this isn’t normal money distribution as to what they had for decades, the problem was that their high end talent was old because the missed so often in the draft to fill out the top half of the rosterIt does, because you're not only paying contracts, you're also paying dead money. I listed all the high contracts in my previous post. It's more than the ones you listed.
Brady $27m
McCourty $13.5m
Gronk $12m
Hightower $11m
Gilmore $15m
Mason $9m
McCourty $5.5m
White $5m
Edelman $8m
Cannon $6m
Jon Jones $6m
$12m for Aaron Hernandez and Antonio Brown dead cap
$14m Thuney
$4m Chung
$5.5m McCourty twin
$4.2m Van Noy
15 players $157m which left $32m for 36 remaining players.
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 3 - April 18 (Through 26yrs)











