- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 14,135
- Reaction score
- 5,725
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Overall due to need I would give it a C minus D plus… I feel like we left out a lot of positions that we really have a strong need for ….. What do you think?
You grade on a curve?
Mcgrone, Perkins and Jennings….I never saw it as a real needWhat happened to need for speed in the LB group?
I had a feeling that ship sailed when we re-signed Bentley.What happened to need for speed in the LB group?
Remember those WR have to get on the field at the same time. Do you think two rookies, one late round pick is going to pick up the offense fast enough to displace veterans like Bourne, Parker, even Meyers who has 4 years in the system?Instant reaction, I give it a C-. They ignored LB and DL (until LATE). I wished they double dipped at WR (instead of RB), especially EXPLOSIVE WRs. I think the Zappe was a really bad pick considering the team who is probably better at drafting WR’s than any team, the Pittsburgh Steelers, took WR Calvin Austin III the very next pick after the Pats took Zappe. Teaming Austin with Thornton would’ve given the Pats incredible explosiveness at WR.
I will be rooting for all of these draft picks big time, I just think the Pats could’ve done much better. We shall see.