Who has done better?
They played in 8 consecutive AFCCG, won 5 of them and 3 SBs.
This was followed up by his QB leaving, in his 40s after a season that started 10-1 and crashed when that qb was injured and playing the worst football of his career, one down year eating that dead money, dealing with the cap fallout of staying on top and having 9 players opt out, then building a playoff team by replacing 45% of the snaps played around a rookie QB. He was just, rightfully, voted Executive of the Year, and people want to crap all over that because evidently they think it was their fandom that created the greatest, longest run in the history of the sport, and the guy making all the decisions to produce it was just along for the ride. You should be frustrated at yourself.
Answer yourself these questions.
With 9 opt outs, zero cap room and cam freaking newton all you have at QB what is a reasonable expectation.
With 45% roster turnover, and a rookie QB starting every game, the 5th rookie qb picked, what was your expectation.
Of the top teams, if you had flipped their QB with the Patriots rookie QB last year, which ones would have still done better? (Meaning how do the “other 52” compare?)