Will Bill Belichick break Don Shula's all time win record?

[Ice_Ice_Brady]

Neither. It’s the statements that I made.
it’s not an argument at all

 

[Ring 6]

Well I guess you got me if I said I never made an argument. Of course you know you are full of crap.

 

[Tony2046]

Neither. It’s the statements that I made.
it’s not an argument at all

Of course it’s hard to tell because there isn’t any inconsistency. Some bozo decided to post my responses to different questions and try to make it appear they are different. They are not.

They are comments made months apart in response to different questions.

Question 1 last year, should Newton play.

Question 2, now, why did BELICHICK okay Newton.

If I would say that I agree, would that be to the statements you made last year or this year?

 

[Ring 6]

If I would say that I agree, would that be to the statements you made last year or this year?

You should agree with both.

 

[Tony2046]

You should agree with both.

But if I did I would be a Hippoclyt.

 

[Ring 6]

But if I did I would be a Hippoclyt.

Nothing hypocritical at all. ( ps you can’t spell very well)

Please explain how

I would play Stidham because I think newton blows
and Belichick played Newton because he has a higher opinion of him and felt he gave him the best chance to win is inconsistent in any way.

Bit you aren’t interested in reality you just want to troll.

 

[Tony2046]

Nothing hypocritical at all. ( ps you can’t spell very well)

Please explain how

I would play Stidham because I think newton blows
and Belichick played Newton because he has a higher opinion of him and felt he gave him the best chance to win is inconsistent in any way.

Bit you aren’t interested in reality you just want to troll.

Are you defending your first position or prosecuting your second position? Hard to tell.

 

[Ring 6]

Are you defending your first position or prosecuting your second position? Hard to tell.

 

[Tony2046]

Exactly.

 

[Clonamery]

Oh, wow, this is must-see TV. Of course, it's re-runs of Lost but still.

 

[Ring 6]

Exactly.

At least you recognize you failings.

 

[sb1]

Nothing hypocritical at all. ( ps you can’t spell very well)

Please explain how

I would play Stidham because I think newton blows
and Belichick played Newton because he has a higher opinion of him and felt he gave him the best chance to win is inconsistent in any way.

Bit you aren’t interested in reality you just want to troll.

Cam sucked. Stid wasn’t much better if he was at all. A QB switch was pointless.

 

[sb1]

There is no confusion where I stand.
1) winning always matters
2) belichick played newton because of 1
3) I wanted belichick to play Stidham because of 1

I don’t see the relation between 1 and 3. Stidham is fine as a backup but he’s not an NFL caliber starting QB.

 

[Huckleberry1]

At a .457% win rate he'll need 101 games to catch Shula. That puts him at 75 years old. I don't see it.

This is aging well.

 

[sb1]

The narrative right now around the Patriots is they are that close to being 8-1 right now.

Too bad Harris fumbled against Miami and the Pats couldn't get over the hump against Dallas and Tampa - if they did BB might be right in the conversation for coach of the year.

 

[venecol]

This is aging well.

At the current 0.462% win rate he'll now need 93 games to catch Shula. That puts him at 75 years old. I still don't see it.

 

[Huckleberry1]

At the current 0.462% win rate he'll now need 93 games to catch Shula. That puts him at 75 years old. I still don't see it.

That’s because you are a moron with an agenda, which never works out well. Case in point, Triump. It’s just sad, even when you know he’s a total douchebag.

 

[venecol]

That’s because you are a moron with an agenda, which never works out well. Case in point, Triump. It’s just sad, even when you know he’s a total douchebag.

Just listing numbers. Not sure why you're so triggered by numbers. Who is Triump?

 

[Huckleberry1]

Just listing numbers. Not sure why you're so triggered by numbers. Who is Triump?

So now are just trolling ?what an @sshole.

 

[venecol]

So now are just trolling ?what an @sshole.

I'm listing numbers based on actual stats, not made up crap. You on the other hand have called me a moron and Ahole for no apparent reason. It's truly sad how pathetically weak you come across, triggered by #s on a football forum. Grow up.