- Joined
- Apr 4, 2013
- Messages
- 10,336
- Reaction score
- 11,182
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
Aghular?You might as well add Ruggs to that list, because the answer is NONE of the above.
c. He doesn't add anything to the team we are not getting from Aghular.
d. Beckham is a media distraction with diminishing skill and a huge contract and ego to go with it. But HE's someone I'd look closely at in the off season. NOT now.
Yeah, I can't understand not wanting OBJ for being a head case (which in itself might be legit) and then calling for Jackson. Jackson shot his way out of a contender because he was unhappy over playing time and targets - on a team that has Cooper Kupp and Robert Woods as their top 2 WRs. He seems to care more about his own stats than winning football games.I wouldn’t want Jackson here for any reason. Think about it: a team that’s all-in and going deep into the postseason just released him. The guy is clearly a head case and not worth it at his age. He’s also a one trick pony.
fits right in with us…jkI watched some video of OBJ, he seems completely out to lunch. Mostly he was falling down and letting the ball hit him in the head.
I’m assuming no team is going to claim OBJ from waivers to pay him $7.25million for the remainder of the season.I thought waiver order applied to OBJ... I assume you're saying DJackson was also just plain released. I'll take him in 2012.
I guess OBJ is intriguing but how does waiver order interract with this, since we did not trade for him before the release?
He doesn’t want to compete for the #1 or #2 WR spot. He wants to be assured of it.OBJ needs to go somewhere where he can compete for a 2 or 1 spot.
So I'm thinking we should be a strong consideration if he makes it past waivers
The correct answer is Wilkerson.