Patriots Rumor The Tom Brady rumor thread

[catent]

"let's not"
"this guy"

 

[Love The Drake]

"let's not"
"this guy"

Let’s not vs he’s not?

 

[SHOWTIME15]

Let’s not vs he’s not?

Or its not...

 

[Love The Drake]

Or its not...

How about why not

 

[Ice_Ice_Brady]

How about why not

“I’m not not.” (Double negative.). He’s coming back!

Or was that three “not”s?

 

[SHOWTIME15]

How about why not

Jules clearly said "he's coming back"...the only logical response from Brady is "he's not" or 'I'm not." "It's not" or "let's not" wouldn't make any sense obviously.

 

[Ice_Ice_Brady]

Jules clearly said "he's coming back"...the only logical response from Brady is "he's not." "It's not" or "let's not" wouldn't make any sense obviously.

The logical response is to talk in the third person?

 

[SHOWTIME15]

The logical response is to talk in the third person?

Jules: "He's coming back."

Tom: "He's not."

Perfectly acceptable response to what Edelman said. If Edelman said, "you're coming back" it's a different story.

 

[fair catch fryar]

If you refuse to listen to regional media then how do you know what Shaughnessy is saying?

Sometimes, not by choice. I carpool to work and I'm forced to listen to WEEI on the way to the office. Just heard enough for about 45 seconds to hear his latest whine/angle at trying to be relevant. The only time I ever see or hear their rants is on here.

 

[supafly]

Everyone on the forum over the past month: “Brady’s just trolling us.”

The reaction to me, when I point out that Brady has been trolling us:

 

[supafly]

Brady is a ventriloquist?

(Third person response)

Supafly didn’t see that MF’s lips move at all.

 

[Brewskies]

The bottom one should be at a table at the Ground Round.

And Brady's response should be "where are the targets."

 

[Brewskies]

I wouldn't mind if Brady came back if the Pats would get some targets, like TEs, WRs, and Backs that will make up for Brady's shortfalls. I don't see the Pats getting that part done, so they would be wasting money signing Brady again. I would rather watch a rebuild that listen to Brady with a pout say "we need to play better" because he doesn't have the necessary players to cover his shortfalls due to age

 

[patman12]

Jules clearly said "he's coming back"...the only logical response from Brady is "he's not" or 'I'm not." "It's not" or "let's not" wouldn't make any sense obviously.

Let's not, as in let's not go there, could work.

 

[Tony2046]

Jules: "He's coming back."

Tom: "He's not."

Perfectly acceptable response to what Edelman said. If Edelman said, "you're coming back" it's a different story.

I don't think Jules said "he's coming back" which makes whatever Tom said irrelevant.

 

[Ladypatsfan]

I wouldn't mind if Brady came back if the Pats would get some targets, like TEs, WRs, and Backs that will make up for Brady's shortfalls. I don't see the Pats getting that part done, so they would be wasting money signing Brady again. I would rather watch a rebuild that listen to Brady with a pout say "we need to play better" because he doesn't have the necessary players to cover his shortfalls due to age

I don't know how they managed to win championships with such a crappy QB.
He has had so many shortfalls all of these years. Just let him leave.

 

[SHOWTIME15]

I don't think Jules said "he's coming back" which makes whatever Tom said irrelevant.

Turn up the volume on your computer/phone and I think you'll see that he clearly says "he's coming back. he's coming back." And I don't like the fact Vrabel is face timing with them. It could mean nothing and that they are just friends on a phone call. But it also could be that Vrabel has been tampering.

 

[Tony2046]

Turn up the volume on your computer/phone and I think you'll see that he clearly says "he's coming back. he's coming back." And I don't like the fact Vrabel is face timing with them. It could mean nothing and that they are just friends on a phone call. It also could be that Vrabel has been tampering.

It sounds more like " His mummy's black" .

" She's not"

 

[1960Pats]

The Pats went 11-5 with Matt Friggen Cassel, and 3-1 with Jimmy G/Jacoby Brissett, so that's 14-6, a .700 win percentage, that translates to 11-5 over a 16 game season.

IF Brady leaves, and Thuney leaves, and Van Noy leaves, that leaves a lot of cap money to fill holes (both offensively AND defensively). My preference is that he stays, but IF he leaves, with BB and Kraft running the show, I don't think the Pats will become a bad team. With Belichick and Kraft, they will always be competitive.

Don't short change Stidham, as a 1st year QB, he showed more promise than Cassel, Jimmy G & Brissett.

The Pats under Bob and Bill also went 5-13 with Drew Bedsoe as their QB. Add it all up and you have a .500 record, which is what Bill's record is without Brady.

 

[Triumph]

Brady is NOT coming back.