- Joined
- Mar 27, 2008
- Messages
- 30,865
- Reaction score
- 29,555
the literal point of my post is that dynasty possibilities shouldn’t start until a 2nd title is won because it takes atleast 3 to be a dynasty
Most NFL experts seem to think that 3 SBs within a short period of time is the benchmark to be one of the top dynasties...Packers (60s), Steelers (70s), Niners (80s), Cowboys (90s), and NE (2000s and 2010s) all satisfy this. Below this (but are still considered by many to be dynasties) are teams that won 3 SBs over a period that was more spread out. The 80s Redskins and 70s/80s Raiders fall in this bucket. I've never seen anyone say 2 SBs within a short time frame constitutes a dynasty.