- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 72,772
- Reaction score
- 22,604
Not trueNo they got the majority of the snaps the last 5 to 6 games around there.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Not trueNo they got the majority of the snaps the last 5 to 6 games around there.
Nice getting Wynn back, and certainly than with Newhouse, but not sure about major. He looked good, not great. I mean look at the 1st and goal against the Titans. He Thuney could not open a hole on the left side at all.Not nearly as much as the loss of Wynn/Andrews/Develin. We saw such a major change just by getting Wynn back when we did.
Not doing a research paper right now, but missing on picks when made and passing on quality receiver has caught up with them.Not significantly. The hit rate for players drafted in those spots isn’t good to begin with.
Complaining about 3 picks over 20 years not working out is silly.
OkBecause they have primarily used other means. They have used far less draft value at WR than other teams do so of course the results are poor. If you don’t value drafting the position and mostly throw late round fliers of course your hit rate is bad.
Nice getting Wynn back, and certainly than with Newhouse, but not sure about major. He looked good, not great. I mean look at the 1st and goal against the Titans. He Thuney could not open a hole on the left side at all.
I am very happy with the results of the Belichick regime.Not doing a research paper right now, but missing on picks when made and passing on quality receiver has caught up with them.
Ok we disagree.Ok
our hit rate is worse than bad.
That's the point...
With the way he moves, he looks like he could be an All Pro L guard.I think an interesting question for the Patriots is whether or not they still think Wynn should be out at LT. If they don't, we could see the Patriots let Thuney go elsewhere, move Wynn inside, and bring in yet another starting LT.
Pointing out that BB is lousy drafting wide receivers or passes too often on the position, hardly means I’m unhappy with these last 20 years. Far from it.I am very happy with the results of the Belichick regime.
But you can’t pick out one thing (wr draft picks) and separate them from everything else (all other positions, fa, trade,UDfa,etc) as if changing one doesn’t change others.Pointing out that BB is lousy drafting wide receivers or passes too often on the position, hardly means I’m unhappy with these last 20 years. Far from it.
But you can’t pick out one thing (wr draft picks) and separate them from everything else (all other positions, fa, trade,UDfa,etc) as if changing one doesn’t change others.
Not without taking into consideration the large dearth of picks used on the position and a clear plan to fill it by other means.In a discussion of this nature? Sure you can.
Thanks for the correction. My misunderstanding. Based on this I would strongly suspect the pats will say goodbye to Mr. Sanu and his 6.5 million cap hit next year.His cap hit is his salary. Any amortized signing bonus stayed on Atlanta’s books.
Hard to say. He’s always been a decent wr3. They tried to get more than that out of him. He did get injured. Not sure why he feel so far off.Thanks for the correction. My misunderstanding. Based on this I would strongly suspect the pats will say goodbye to Mr. Sanu and his 6.5 million cap hit next year.
Draft and FA wise, and even trade wise, Belichick has been subpar. We wouldn’t be in this position if it weren’t true.
.
Not without taking into consideration the large dearth of picks used on the position and a clear plan to fill it by other means.
In other words if a team chooses to build an OL primarily through the draft and makes only a limited number of modest free agent acquisitions you can’t compare their free agency results to trans that spend heavily in FA on the position without taking the difference into account.
Hard to say. He’s always been a decent wr3. They tried to get more than that out of him. He did get injured. Not sure why he feel so far off.
On the one hand 6.5 mill isn’t nuts for a capable wr3 but on the other hand it’s a good chunk to add to getting someone better.
I’ve never thought much of sanu. The idea wouldn’t be to cut him and make it worse it would be to cut him and use 6.5 mill to make it better.fair enough
Sanu is a decent #3 WR, who has been injured. $6.5M may be a reasonable price for our 2020 #3. I suppose, Belichick could cut him and make the problem even worse than it is.
| 8 | 915 |
| 118 | 7K |
| 137 | 8K |
| 20 | 651 |
| 320 | 22K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
May 28 - June 12 (Through 26yrs)











