I guess it is time to hire a guy to run around the sideline and let the receivers know not to jump into the faces of other players. Or the long snapper to properly secure the ball. Or a ST standout player to wrap up properly. Or the QB to throw the ball to the open guy who will get a first down instead of waiting for the intermediate route to develop. I mean how could professionals that have been playing this at that level for many years possibly know any of that ? Right ?
Bademosi’s missed tackle and Richards covering Ertz don’t happen with a better defensive game plan laid out. McCourty playing in the box and instead playing deep to utilize his range doesn’t happen with a better defensive game plan laid out. Chung covering Ertz in key moments instead of Agholor happens with a better defensive game plan laid out. These are very simple concepts that I don’t think you’re failing to grasp. Instead, I merely think you don’t want to.
Will mistakes still happen? Sure. But a better defensive game plan LIMITS them in a game where one more stop was the difference between an L and a W. Hence the point: the game was lost before kickoff due to the suspect game plan laid out by the coaching staff on defense.
Those are fundamental mistakes that have nothing to do with what player is on the field and what the situation is. But sure lets absolve the players who ****ed
up the most basic things and put all blame on the coaches.
As has just been pointed out to you above, many of those mistakes have everything to do with the player that is on the field and the role they're playing. They were put into that position by the game plan that was laid out.
Are you ****ing ******ed ? Did you hit your head hard on something ? Seriously do you have issues with comprehending the English language ?
I would certainly hope not for your sake. Considering the ease with which I'm handing you your head. That wouldn't reflect well on you. Your anger and the subsequent ad hominem are noted (and laughed at), though. The latter is typically a sign that your opponent knows that he either has no argument or a losing one.
I have been saying for months that the gameplan was not good. Even in the post you are quoting.
And if you would take a second to stop and think about it, you would realize that you're actually agreeing with me.
Who cares ? Does it make any difference if it is 20:80, 40:60 or 50:50 ?
You could have had the best gameplan of all time and if your players play like they did you might still end up empty handed.
Not when a better game plan both puts those players in better positions to succeed (McCourty, Chung) or takes them off the field altogether (Richards, Badmosi).
The reality is that the situation is considerably more nuanced than "the game was lost before it began". But keep talking yourself even deeper into a hole.
Not really. It's actually pretty black and white. You're unsuccessfully trying to introduce shades of grey that don't argue away my central point while, at the same time, establishing my point as the correct one.
