Ice_Ice_Brady
where black is the color where none is the number
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 26,979
- Reaction score
- 53,352
Brady is Montana. Rodgers is Young
More Steve Young.
Spot on.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Brady is Montana. Rodgers is Young
More Steve Young.
Who you want to sleep with isn’t the argument.
Hey, there’s nothing to be ashamed about. Your preference is completely subjective and in no way says anything about who you really are as a fan.lol.....what a sh*thead reply
This is your most egregious post, including the political ones.if the opportunity arose this morning, I would dump Brady in a heartbeat if I could get Rodgers
We weren’t talking about coaches. Play style wise, Rodgers is more comparable to Young and he’s had similar post season results.so coaching has nothing to do with it? Mccarthy = BB?
Edgar Bennett = Mcdaniels?
LOL
Hey, there’s nothing to be ashamed about. Your preference is completely subjective and in no way says anything about who you really are as a fan.
We weren’t talking about coaches. Play style wise, Rodgers is more comparable to Young and he’s had similar post season results.
Also I wasn’t even comparing Rodgers to Brady so I don’t know why you would compare their coaches.
I quite clearly did. You prefer QBs from the legs up rather than from the head down. No shame in that. It’s what a lot of t-boys, I mean fanboys like.stick to the topic you idiot
Brady is nothing like Montana so it ends right there........your entire point is wasted motion
I quite clearly did. You prefer QBs from the legs up rather than from the head down. No shame in that. It’s what a lot of t-boys, I mean fanboys like.
Two most successful QB’s of the modern era, both known for clutch play. For each of their respective eras they were largely the two players that most closely resemble each other.
You’re digging into the weeds to be argumentative
I’m didn’t claim they were identical duplicates genius, but act more like a ****. I was talking about accomplishments, reputation, perception.they are completely different QB's ..... there is no resemblance in their play......but thanks for confirming that you are actually clueless when it comes to playing the game
I’m didn’t claim they were identical duplicates genius, but act more like a ****. I was talking about accomplishments, reputation, perception.
But thanks for confirming you have no perception of context
lol........by your logic Earl Campbell is just like Barry Sanders because they both ran with the ball and both their careers ended early......
in that case, your point is completely pointless
Both won the most Super Bowls of their era, both known for clutch play and being the ultimate winners. Again you’re being argumentative for the sake of it and being a **** this whole thread, not just with me. Having a rough day?
Omg you are truly obtuse. I’m making a comparison about attributes that are unique and apply to very few people (in this case there’s only a handful of QB’s in the last 40 or so years that won the most Championships in their era and were known for being extremely clutch performers). That’s very different than taking an attribute that is common to nearly the entire league to prove some silly childish point.not at all........so the pats are just like the jets because they both fill their stadiums
your comparison is meaningless
| 95 | 6K |
| 83 | 3K |
| 95 | 4K |
| 96 | 3K |
| 101 | 4K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 9 - April 24 (Through 26yrs)











