- Joined
- Mar 27, 2008
- Messages
- 30,865
- Reaction score
- 29,555
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Stupid, and begging for a lawsuit in response
You have some law experience, right? Could you shed some light on what kind of lawsuit Jones could levy? It seems that "conduct detrimental" gives Goodell an enormous amount of leeway, as seen in the Brady case. I'm not a lawyer, however, so my understanding of the matter is admittedly incomplete. Player rights vs franchise rights are probably quite different, I imagine. Curious about your input.
Stupid, and begging for a lawsuit in response
You have some law experience, right? Could you shed some light on what kind of lawsuit Jones could levy? It seems that "conduct detrimental" gives Goodell an enormous amount of leeway, as seen in the Brady case. I'm not a lawyer, however, so my understanding of the matter is admittedly incomplete. Player rights vs franchise rights are probably quite different, I imagine. Curious about your input.
Goodell can stand on a podium, tell bald face lies to the media regarding tb12 and deflategate and get off scottfree... and he thinks he can judge someone else? Jones should get a freakin medal for trying to oust commissioner ginger
I'm not a big fan of Jerry Jones.....but is there a bigger scumbag than Roger Goodell? You got your big fat contract Roger.....now STFU!
Goodell can stand on a podium, tell bald face lies to the media regarding tb12 and deflategate and get off scottfree... and he thinks he can judge someone else?
Imagine being the judge ruling on whether Goodell can call someone's reticence about giving him $40m a year "conduct detrimental". The obvious baseline is to rule against Goodell immediately, and laugh while doing it, and you work backwards from there based upon further information.
The two are not mutually exclusive.I agree, but I still think Jones is a slimeball.