I think the part that irks me the most is how other NFL fans are eating this up because "Well Belichick traded Garoppolo for peanuts while Brady is in his 40s, clearly something is up there!"
This was also a major point of argument for Wickersham and his "Brady forced Kraft and Belichick to trade Garoppolo because he felt threatened". This part is really nonsensical. This completely ignores:
1. Brady is most likely going to win his third MVP award, if not finishes second in voting, which clearly indicates that Brady is still playing at an elite level. Threatened? Pfft.
2. We could not have franchise tagged Garoppolo because we are not paying two QBs using 25%+ of our total cap.
3. Garoppolo wants to start, and there was no opportunities for him here with Brady still playing at a high level.
If people actually logically think about this, there is really nothing suspicious with the Garoppolo trade. Belichick is not "moving on one year early" because Brady is still capable of playing at a high level for the next two years, we don't have the time or the money to continue to keep Garoppolo as our backup. It's really simple as that.
I want to ask Wickersham: If Garoppolo wasn't playing at a high level, would you have written this article at all?
Dude, nobody is eating this crap up. Everyone with half a brain can see that this is another "sports drama" fake piece to make big news out of Brady and Garoppolo when no big news existed. Yet another "the patriots' demise is imminent.... stay tuned!" article we see every year except at least in previous years they would have had a bad game before the article was released. This time they are sitting on top of the NFL and are the favourites to win the SuperBowl. Just really poor trolling effort by ESPN..











