primetime
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2005
- Messages
- 13,636
- Reaction score
- 15,379
1 thing about our reaction (without proof) to the not guilty finding. Some here feel they have enough evidence and know better than the jury.
I don't follow these cases that closely, but are u sure? The reason I say that is that if there is somebody else guilty of these crimes still on the street, and some DA just wanted a case closed for career purposes, what better patsy than a guy already convicted?
He was found not guilty of murder in the first degree in the double murder (but guilty in the Lloyd murder), but his presence and indeed involvement in the double murder was never in question. The 'not guilty' was basically the jury determining that the evidence was not sufficient to prove that Hernandez was the one who pulled the trigger that night as opposed to his friend Bradley, who was the prosecution's chief witness in the trial, and nothing else.
I have complicated feelings about this whole thing because I think life without parole is a horrible sentence, perhaps even worse than capital punishment given our inhuman system of incarceration. I don't feel particularly sorry for Aaron Hernandez, who was guilty of at least one cold-blooded murder and at least partly culpable for at least two more... but I wish that, in the first place, his life had gone some other way and, second, even after he had committed truly heinous acts, that he had options with the rest of his God-given life that were not suicide.
Last edited:












