ESPN does another hatchet job on TB

[upstater1]

The article actually argued that Brady doesn't deserve it because Legarette Blount has a lead-leading 18 TDs, whereas Rodgers' RBs had less than half that.

As though an RB scoring TDs detracts from the QB who lead the team down there.

 

[venecol]

The article actually argued that Brady doesn't deserve it because Legarette Blount has a lead-leading 18 TDs, whereas Rodgers' RBs had less than half that.

As though an RB scoring TDs detracts from the QB who lead the team down there.

It also argues that TB made no contribution in the first 4 games because we wasn't allowed to sit in meetings, attend practice, etc. That actually makes his performance even better since he didn't have the benefit of those 4 games to tune his games with brand new players (Hogan, Mitchell, Bennett). Graziano is an idiot and the article is nonsense.

 

[Jlaff]

As one poster asked, "how much money is ESPN losing this weekend?". Shouldn't they be writing articles hyping the matchup between Osweisler and Clock? (two quarterbacks who aren't yet good enough to warrant me learning how to spell their names properly)

 

[A Defiant Goose]

The article actually argued that Brady doesn't deserve it because Legarette Blount has a lead-leading 18 TDs, whereas Rodgers' RBs had less than half that.

As though an RB scoring TDs detracts from the QB who lead the team down there.

And because the Packers throw on 1st and 2nd & GOAL on a rate of like 60+% and the Pats throw on a rate of around 38%. I saw it somewhere. Maybe not here. Maybe some other forum