PATRIOTS NEWS Tom Brady, NFLPA Granted 14-Day Extension To File Motion For Rehearing By Second Circuit Court

[Huckleberry1]

What purpose would that serve and why would you ask someone to communicate with a self proclaimed oxidized nut job?

All good points.

 

[Dorito Dink]

A dorito dink suit would do that.

Brady himself will not sue for reasons already stated.

Sit tight. I'm working on it.

 

[Rusty Griswold]

Although Rusty won't read my posts he apparently quotes every one for posterity, so if someone could please inform him that people don't testify to the Supreme Court it would really help. For some reason he just can't grasp that reality.

Umm, a defamation suit for brady and Goodell needing to take a stand is not the same discussion as one of the SC Justices hearing a case.

Maybe I mis-spoke somewhere in here, or god forbid, one of you showcases horrendous reading comprehension skills, but try to keep up.

Brady has MULTIPLE options on the table, including a defamation suit, where yes, Goodell and Harbaugh would testify.

I can only imagine what is on all of their cellphones throughout all of this.

Also, Congress is also paying attention. I would imagine how late the NFL reacted to gettting HGH testing in 2014, didn't sit well. That should have bee in the 2011 CBA.

I don't think Selig enjoyed his time in front of Congress.

Is there a rule for quoting the insecure people's posts?

 

[Clonamery]

What purpose would that serve and why would you ask someone to communicate with a self proclaimed oxidized nut job?

Yeah, he's definitely huffing something.

 

[Huckleberry1]

Is everyone aware that Ginsburg is the SC Justice overseeing the 2nd circuit? Unless you've been under a rock, which clearly Goodell never thought it might go to her at this point, this is a huge piece of leverage for Brady.

Ginsburg is liberal and would be ruling on a landmark case, as I've said from the beginning. This goes way beyond the NFL bubble. It would then be about employee rights and employees being set up for violations they didn't commit, for ulterior motives, namely financial gains and ego, power and greed.

This is huge. I was mocked for my opinion on this on Boston Globe board, as I have been for other opinions there for years, but in the end, I am usually correct.

I'll repeat this one more time: Goodell doesn't want his hand anywhere near a bible under oath in front of a SCOUTUS hearing. Nowhere near it, which is why I believe the owners DID want Brady to settle AFTER Goodell's win last month. They are wrong in thinking Brady would ever settle, which has to have them crapping in their pants.

That's why Goodell quickly came out and publicly stated "we are not settling". He thinks it's over right now, but he's mistaken, as are his attorneys.

Brady has the leverage here.

It's in Sheriff Goebbels's best interest to somehow lose with it kicked back hearing only at the 2nd court level, with a stay and En Banc, as opposed to sit in front of Ginsburg answering for a fraud Wells Report he and Pash engineered and doctored.

You didn't " misspeak " Rusty, you clearly stated that Goodell would be testifying in front of Ginsberg.

It's no wonder you get mocked wherever you run your piehole because you don't know what the hell you are talking about, and this post demonstrates that. There are 3rd graders with a better understanding of the legal system.

 

[Rusty Griswold]

You didn't " misspeak " Rusty, you clearly stated that Goodell would be testifying in front of Ginsberg.

It's no wonder you get mocked wherever you run your piehole because you don't know what the hell you are talking about, and this post demonstrates that. There are 3rd graders with a better understanding of the legal system.

Well, then, my mistake. I am well aware people don't testify in front of the SC Justices. I think you well know I meant Goodell to have this get in front of Ginsburg. It's his investigation and his fiasco here. It would be an outright embarrassment and disaster for the NFL going into the next CBA.

You seem to think Goodell has the leverage here, and he doesn;t/ It's why the owners, or at least some, wanted him to knock to down to 2 or 1 games, even recently, hoping Brady would bite.

Way to be a "dbag" and "berate" me. I am just all broken up over it. My life is ruined on a Pats clique board.

Oh, what ever shall I do?

 

[Joker]

you might consider ritual seppuku...

 

[Clonamery]

you might consider ritual seppuku...

Jesus Christo....the voice of reason.

 

[Tony2046]

Notice anything?


How about now?



Now?



It's a picture of tranquility.

 

[Mack Herron]

Status update:

 

[Ring 6]

Yeah, right. I suppose Jax moving to London isn't a reality, too. I suppose Bennett flew to London by accident to accounce their draft pick this year. It's all just one big mirage.

I had that nailed about 3 years ago, too.

Showcasing a crappy Jax team in London because Kahn's TV money in Jax sucks, is not a mirage. It's real.

Jax can't get off the ground there without some kind of success out of the gate.

What does any of that have to do with the stupidity you are spewing in this thread?

 

[Ring 6]

Umm, a defamation suit for brady and Goodell needing to take a stand is not the same discussion as one of the SC Justices hearing a case.

I don't think Ginsburg hears defamation suits.

Maybe I mis-spoke somewhere in here, or god forbid, one of you showcases horrendous reading comprehension skills, but try to keep up.

If you are covering your mistake by saying you mis-spoke why would you castigate the reader? You said it, so criticizing the readers comprehension is dumb.

Brady has MULTIPLE options on the table, including a defamation suit, where yes, Goodell and Harbaugh would testify.

You do realize a defamation suit is an uphill battle, right? You do realize that as a public figure the burden is high, and Goodell's ruling on what he considers the facts exercising authority given him in the CBA is not defamation. Brady must prove an effort to purposely defame him. Goodell doesn't like him and the Wells report is crap doesn't even get him in the front door of the court house. Not sure how you suppose Harbaugh is testifying, or why you think that is a big deal.

I can only imagine what is on all of their cellphones throughout all of this.

That will never be allowed as discovery.

Also, Congress is also paying attention. I would imagine how late the NFL reacted to gettting HGH testing in 2014, didn't sit well. That should have bee in the 2011 CBA.

This makers no sense.

I don't think Selig enjoyed his time in front of Congress.

This has no relevance

Is there a rule for quoting the insecure people's posts?

Hope not or I just broke it.

Dude, I get you are pissed off, but acting like you are an expert on things you know nothing about (but have a sister in law who is an attorney, and you sent email to another one) just leads to this type of disaster of a thread.
I'm sure you are an OK guy when you aren't being blindly obsessive and arguing with anyone who points out your lack of knowledge, so maybe you should try posting on a different topic and leave this one alone for a while.

 

[Wheelman]

Notice anything?


How about now?



Now?



It's a picture of tranquility.

I've never used the ignore feature before! Thanks for the insightful post. Normally myself I just skim past the posters who post nonsense. This gives me the opportunity to dislike their posts when necessary, further trolling them.

 

[Tony2046]

I've never used the ignore feature before! Thanks for the insightful post. Normally myself I just skim past the posters who post nonsense. This gives me the opportunity to dislike their posts when necessary, further trolling them.

Same here but I've used it twice. Once for an obvious Bronco troll and now. I guess my limit is when you surpass 20 I's, Me's or My's in each post, throw in "I communicate with Steph" and top it off with "my sister in law says so" it's time to ignore.

 

[Rusty Griswold]

What does any of that have to do with the stupidity you are spewing in this thread?

Sounds great, Greg.

 

[Rusty Griswold]

Same here but I've used it twice. Once for an obvious Bronco troll and now. I guess my limit is when you surpass 20 I's, Me's or My's in each post, throw in "I communicate with Steph" and top it off with "my sister in law says so" it's time to ignore.

Wow. You have a sever inferiority complex. Good luck with everything else.

Does a robot type for you on these boards? If it's not you, using "I", speaking for yourself, who is it?

 

[Rusty Griswold]

I don't think Ginsburg hears defamation suits.


If you are covering your mistake by saying you mis-spoke why would you castigate the reader? You said it, so criticizing the readers comprehension is dumb.


You do realize a defamation suit is an uphill battle, right? You do realize that as a public figure the burden is high, and Goodell's ruling on what he considers the facts exercising authority given him in the CBA is not defamation. Brady must prove an effort to purposely defame him. Goodell doesn't like him and the Wells report is crap doesn't even get him in the front door of the court house. Not sure how you suppose Harbaugh is testifying, or why you think that is a big deal.


That will never be allowed as discovery.


This makers no sense.


This has no relevance


Hope not or I just broke it.

Dude, I get you are pissed off, but acting like you are an expert on things you know nothing about (but have a sister in law who is an attorney, and you sent email to another one) just leads to this type of disaster of a thread.
I'm sure you are an OK guy when you aren't being blindly obsessive and arguing with anyone who points out your lack of knowledge, so maybe you should try posting on a different topic and leave this one alone for a while.

That sounds great, Greg.

You sound like a messageboard specialist!

 

[Rusty Griswold]

Notice anything?


How about now?



Now?



It's a picture of tranquility.

Yeah, it's a damn good thing you announced that. The world is saved! Banner day for you Tony!

 

[Patsfanin Philly]

Right.
But, that has nothing to do with how much info they turn over (or don't turn over) to a request from an opposing attorney.
Those kinds of decisions don't really constitute "help."
In other words, there is no legal way to obstruct justice.
These are individual decisions that people make.
Kraft can't be out of contract for legally complying with a court. That is just silly.

I guess it all depends on the definition of "help". They (Kraft/Pats)could certainly legally give Brady everything he is entitled to and as long as they kept it professional, the league couldn't punish Kraft....And you can be sure the league will have eagle eyes on that one...
Certainly Kraft wouldn't be punished for complying with discovery requests or subpoenas issued by a court for documents but my definition of help that might be problematic for Kraft would be relating private conversations such as what Goodell told Kraft in confidence........
I'm no Goodell fan but Kraft is in a bind between trying to help Brady and knowing Goodell is waiting to pounce and issue more punishment......

 

[ViperGTS]

Same here but I've used it twice. Once for an obvious Bronco troll and now. I guess my limit is when you surpass 20 I's, Me's or My's in each post, throw in "I communicate with Steph" and top it off with "my sister in law says so" it's time to ignore.

Get ready. Once you engage a Rusty you will be finding it reappears as another. It's really like a mutating virus. We need some serious board antibiotics to rid ourselves of this pest. It's not always what a Rusty says, it's how it just never seems to go away. A truly terrible experience.