anditsgood
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Messages
- 6,370
- Reaction score
- 3,624
No Joker is rightI took the OP's post at face value. He was insulting Roger Goodell.
Calling re-ards Roger Goodell is far more insulting
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.No Joker is rightI took the OP's post at face value. He was insulting Roger Goodell.
i have a thing for brawny alpha males like roger and youYou like being choked in bed, don't you? You sick ****.
I knew I had you pegged.i have a thing for brawny alpha males like roger and you
and on top of that, you are pretty intelligent and articulate
it is a paradoxical "contradiction" that i find enticing
Out of respect to the Walker family it is in poor taste but to the gen pop its fine.Would it be in poor taste and un-pc to hope that Paul Walker's remains would be a good choice to portray the 2016 and beyond version of Goodell?
If so then I won't suggest it.
Would it be in poor taste and un-pc to hope that Paul Walker's remains would be a good choice to portray the 2016 and beyond version of Goodell?
If so then I won't suggest it.
There was a time in our history when black people were considered less than human, and the N word was the label used to convey that. There was a time when gay people were considered less than human, and the F word was the label used to convey that. I would like to think that we have come to a point in society that we consider developmentally disabled people human and show them the respect they deserve.... seeing as how they are largely unable to enact social change on their own. To say these terms are acceptable now is to publicly convey that the time in which they were used was a time when these groups were treated fairly. That's why I use the word hate, and that's why I simply pointed it out to the OP - because I had faith that he doesn't openly think less of that group of people. It's a simple way of showing respect for/not forgetting history and the hardships people have had to endure.
I would love to follow you around as you call black people n****rs to their face, or gay people f****ts. And I guarantee, if you were to call a handicapped person a r****d around me, you would change your thoughts on that statement. Some people want to call it over-sensitivity, then I am absolutely over-sensitive about this particular issue.....
Truth is, I have personally been diagnosed as autism spectrum. I don't like sharing this information, because people still DO treat me differently. I often have the hard choice of trying to fit in, and having people treat me like a fool (as Deus Irae has so eloquently done), or I can admit to it and have people pat me on the head. Like the handicapped people I'm defending, I just desperately want to be on the same playing field - hence my handle.
I have trouble grouping together and simplifying my thoughts, especially when it comes to my views on altruism and social justice.... but it doesn't mean my thoughts aren't well thought out or objective. Most of the time, when I try to convey my ideas to people, I get close minded, prepared responses used from other arguments they've had... like I did from Deus Irae. People who want to group me in with the "PC crowd" or insist that I "subscribe" to a certain way of thinking. My whole goal is to be objective and my initial response was just that, an honest response. I found myself taken aback by the willingness to link that group of people to a compete piece of **** like Goodell.
I understand that the OP wasn't referring to an actual disabled person by that term, but he used it with the connotation that it's an insult - that Goodell is a bad person because he is mentally handicapped, NOT because he's an unreasonable, vindictive, overpaid *******. That's the kind of thinking that I personally feel is my duty to limit. It's just not ok.
Edit: just wanted to point out that calling Goodell an ***hole was auto-edited out.
Roger may be a corrupt and incompetent tool
but he does have a kind of rugged, lone ranger allure to him
got a little John Wayne in him.....he showed Kraft and everyone else that he was the Sheriff......that takes true grit
Roger may be a corrupt and incompetent tool
but he does have a kind of rugged, lone ranger allure to him
got a little John Wayne in him.....he showed Kraft and everyone else that he was the Sheriff......that takes true grit
yeah James..he does have a little John Wayne in him...
JOHN WAYNE GACY, that is......
Ok MickeyYou'll never understand, Uncle Joe......You and me, we're not even the same species......I used to be you, then I evolved.......From where you're standing, you're a man........From where I'm standing, you're an ape........You're not even an ape......You're a brady homer......Homerism is like the weather, only it's man-made weather.......trolling?......It's pure......You're the one made it impure......You're buying and selling fear.......You say "why?" I say "why bother?"
You'll never understand, Uncle Joe......You and me, we're not even the same species......
I used to be you, then I evolved.......From where you're standing, you're a man........
From where I'm standing, you're an ape........You're not even an ape......
You're a brady homer......Homerism is like the weather, only it's man-made weather.......
trolling?......It's pure......You're the one made it impure......You're buying and selling fear.......
You say "why?"........I say "why bother?"
Ok Mickey
Think James when Johnny Boy says Mikey...."I got somethin for ya..."
| 52 | 12K |
| 30 | 5K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 6 - April 21 (Through 26yrs)











