upstater1
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2005
- Messages
- 30,281
- Reaction score
- 22,533
Could it be that she was prescribed it for Postpartum Fatigue?
Perhaps, but what about breastfeeding?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Could it be that she was prescribed it for Postpartum Fatigue?
That's why I believe we are going to start hearing about Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
EDIT: I just listened to the WEEI/ Kravitz interview and he mentioned that he was treated by Guyer with HGH for being Fatigued. I don't think that's a coincidence.
Bob Kravitz on Peyton Manning 12-29-15
Cripes, they were dispensing HGH like M&Ms. I'm freaking fatigued. I get home from work sometimes at 11 and get to bed at 1. Up by 6 to take the kids to school! Where is this Guyer Institute again?
How did he find out what she was treated for? Did Irsay/Grigson tell him like they did with info regarding air pressure in footballs?
Nobody has said what she was treated for but in the MMQB and a Milehighreport they speculated, in defence, that it could have been for fertility purposes which we now know is illegal.
The reason I believe Manning is going to state Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is because Gury Institute treats it and there are reports that state HGH helps with the symptoms of which one could be low GH levels.
Still, as others have said, a peculiar place to go for CFS treatment.
Indiana... I'd stay away.
Why the hell did Kravitz go there?
Sometimes these places get a reputation for being loose with drugs and suddenly high society is beating down the doors.
I agree but I think he will beat it for a different reason.True. I think Manning will "beat" it, too, because there's really no way, at least not yet, of proving he took it. It was sent to his wife, after all. The big question is why? Did she have a medical reason for it or was it for something else (her recovering husband)?
That logic pisses me off. Not directed at you @TuckI agree but I think he will beat it for a different reason.
The NFL wants Manning's legacy to stay in tact, unscathed and pristine so they will make it so.
The PR campaign has already started with their first statement on the matter. It was something to the effect of...
"The league will look into the report because it something they feel obliged to do"
It's not about integrity here, it might not even be something they want to do. By saying they will look into it because the are obliged to do so they are setting the bar low for their own due diligence.
That logic pisses me off. Not directed at you @Tuck
So its ok for the NFL to shred the reputation of TB12 and not PM?
F that. I want Ted Wells on this.
Cripes, they were dispensing HGH like M&Ms. I'm freaking fatigued. I get home from work sometimes at 11 and get to bed at 1. Up by 6 to take the kids to school! Where is this Guyer Institute again?
I agree with all of the above.I agree but I think he will beat it for a different reason.
The NFL wants Manning's legacy to stay in tact, unscathed and pristine so they will make it so.
The PR campaign has already started with their first statement on the matter. It was something to the effect of...
"The league will look into the report because it is something they feel obliged to do"
It's not about integrity here, it might not even be something they want to do. By saying they will look into it because the are obliged to do so they are setting the bar low for their own due diligence.
There was an article linked to in another thread stating that state and federal authorities in IN would probably look into Guyer now based on this report. I hope they do.I agree with all of the above.
But, there's another angle here. Wasn't Barry Bonds investigated by the Feds for his connections to BALCO? That could happen to Manning. The NFL might not be able to stop such an investigation.
Because, you see kids, while supposedly letting air out of a football is not a crime, using HGH for off-label purposes might indeed be a crime.
There is no story here, Aljazeera is as credible as the onion news.
There is no story here, Aljazeera is as credible as the onion news.
There is no story here, Aljazeera is as credible as the onion news.
| 82 | 13K |
| 105 | 21K |
| 9 | 3K |
| 33 | 5K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 5 - April 20 (Through 26yrs)











