- Joined
- Dec 22, 2008
- Messages
- 15,913
- Reaction score
- 18,043
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.If that's true, then it lends credence that Wells was a man who cared more about being right than he did about the truth.
@RapSheet: Don Yee: “The Wells report omitted nearly all of Tom’s testimony, most of which was critical. It would have provided context that it lacks”
@RapSheet: Don Yee: “It’s omission of key facts & lines of inquiry suggest investigators reached a conclusion, then determined so-called facts later.”
They hired a consulting firm that has received criticism in the past for skewing its data for its client benefits. I think that is rather telling.
Does this mean that TFB is going to come out firing?
That's what ticks me off. The investigation was so one-sided. If they pulled in so much circumstantial info to come up with a "probably",why not present info that disproves the assertion that this was a sting? So annoying.The optics are awful for the NFL and the Wells report. All of the other infractions or behaviors that resulted in fines and suspensions were built on tangible evidence: Woody tampering (video), Spygate (video), Bountygate (money, testimony, audiotape), Ray Rice (video), etc. This one is built on "more probable than not" and a bunch of texts between team staffers.
Now, the NFL has to do something after bungling so many of the previous ones. I think the Woody Johnson $100,000 fine is a clue to what's coming. Guilty but a slap on the wrist.
As is the use of the word "probably" throughout the report and all over it's conclusion...
Ignorance is your choice.
Belichick is responsible for HIS team and support staff as it relates to competing in the NFL.
Go bsck to burying your head in the sand.
I could be wrong but I'd bet this is the last "independent investigation" the NFL contracts out to Wells.
Statement from Tom Brady's agent, Don Yee:
"The Wells report, with all due respect, is a significant and terrible disappointment. It’s omission of key facts and lines of inquiry suggest the investigators reached a conclusion first, and then determined so-called facts later. One item alone taints this entire report. What does it say about the league office’s protocols and ethics when it allows one team to tip it off to an issue prior to a championship game, and no league officials or game officials notified the Patriots of the same issue prior to the game? This suggests it may be more probable than not that the league cooperated with the Colts in perpetrating a sting operation. The Wells report buries this issue in a footnote on page 46 without any further elaboration. The league is a significant client of the investigators' law firm; it appears to be a rich source of billings and media exposure based on content in the law firm's website. This was not an independent investigation and the contents of the report bear that out – all one has to do is read closely and critically, as opposed to simply reading headlines. The investigators' assumptions and inferences are easily debunked or subject to multiple interpretations. Much of the report’s vulnerabilities are buried in the footnotes, which is a common legal writing tactic. It is a sad day for the league as it has abdicated the resolution of football-specific issues to people who don’t understand the context or culture of the sport. I was physically present for my client’s interview. I have verbatim notes of the interview. Tom made himself available for nearly an entire day and patiently answered every question. It was clear to me the investigators had limited understanding of professional football. For reasons unknown, the Wells report omitted nearly all of Tom’s testimony, most of which was critical because it would have provided this report with the context that it lacks. Mr. Wells promised back in January to share the results of this investigation publicly, so why not follow through and make public all of the information gathered and let the public draw its own conclusions? This report contains significant and tragic flaws, and it is common knowledge in the legal industry that reports like this generally are written for the benefit of the purchaser."
I base it on personal experience 9for 20 years). I've been trolled on message boards since there were message boards. I've had people with vendettas against me for no logical reason, repeating false information all the time, assigning motive to things I've done and the like.
Half of the reason an entertainer is paid is because he/she gives miserable people something to ***** about.
Your star QB, who is largely responsible for the success that your franchise has enjoyed, is ready to fight this Bob.
Now lead, join him. or get the bleep out of the way!
I'd confidently say he's lawyered up.
That's what ticks me off. The investigation was so one-sided. If they pulled in so much circumstantial info to come up with a "probably",why not present info that disproves the assertion that this was a sting? So annoying.
Actually, it really does suck balls, very definitively. No probably in this statementRight. For instance, the report probably sucks balls, but I can't say definitively.
You're using the Ted Wells logic
so you're basing it on nothing.......you're assuming everyone thinks like you do
ok
I think Kraft made it clear at the conclusion of his statement yesterday that he's probably going to lay down...
| 14 | 654 |
| 47 | 5K |
| 43 | 3K |
| 18 | 3K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 9 - April 24 (Through 26yrs)











