Michigan Dave
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2005
- Messages
- 1,382
- Reaction score
- 0
Well let me see. You say no one knows more than being reported, well I do. The police don't tell the media everything they have..I say I have inside info and you say you have inside info direct from close friends of "pac". Fine I call you on that. If "pac" gives a version to his friends what version do you think it is? My friends talked to everyone involved..oh except for the unknown shooter who NO ONE knows it seems. Watched video of the original altercation and have ALL the facts available. I'm sorry does that seem equal? I have been in court many times on high profile murder cases, drug cases ect. I defintely will take the percentages that my friends are way more than 50% truthful and that is just common sense. They aren't going on thier opinion they are dealing with the facts of the case. I will tell you the porsecutors office is scared of the money "pac" can throw at this case as they have a budget that this case will blow, plus please they simpley are not of the caliber of 'pac's" lawyers they are pblic servants not high priced Defense attorney's.
I'm sorry. I will not believe this. Just like I'm not 10% on board with what I've heard from league peeps re: Jones' statements, I'm not buying "inside information" from a poster arguing with me on a message board. I am not saying that your friends are not truthful. I am saying that I will wait until the case is presented until I believe it myself. You have talked to these people, you know their credibility, therefore it makes sense for you to believe that. I know none of this, so I'd think you would understand my hesitancy. I respect your opinion. Also, it's odd to me they would be afraid of Pac's attorneys. Just argue the merits of your case, and you're OK.
Also not sure how I am suppossed to take this comment.."So my friends are liars, but yours aren't because they are conducting an investigation? I have great respect for law enforcement, but to insinuate that those investigating are 100% truthful, or that law enforcement/prosecutors sometimes don't go out of their way to charge high profile cases, well, you may be buying that bridge back. I will take the statement I've heard from Jones through my friends as credibly as the statements from the LVPD. The truth is probably somewhere in between.
Not real sure how I take "but to insinuate that those investigators are 100% truthful"...? How do I take that? Really pretty much called my friends liars I think.
Again, it's happened before. You are asking me to take what I do know, and throw it out based on an argument that you can't give me (other than "he is guilty, my friends told me.") I won't do that. Who is/isn't a liar is irrelevant to me. That is a semantic, and isn't central to the argument I am making about the suspension.