- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
all I am saying is that if someone is wrong in what they post why do some feel a need to correct them to the point of 100% factual information? The people claiming the other is wrong also do not have 100% factual information that the person is not right.
Because it's really stupid and, in the case of a charge as serious as murder, really irresponsible, to proclaim someone "clearly guilty" when that's "clearly" not the case because the evidence is unknown and the reports that are out there are conflicting.
Or, to put it another way..... This isn't a discussion of O.J., post trial, where the evidence is out for all to see and discuss.
Or ... some feel a need to control the thread ... now that's the ticket.
I doubt that has anything to do with it. It certainly doesn't apply in my case.